HUMA Committee Meeting
Notices of Meeting include information about the subject matter to be examined by the committee and date, time and place of the meeting, as well as a list of any witnesses scheduled to appear. The Evidence is the edited and revised transcript of what is said before a committee. The Minutes of Proceedings are the official record of the business conducted by the committee at a sitting.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
Minutes of Proceedings
The committee resumed consideration of the motion of Rosemarie Falk moved on February 5, 2024 which read as follows:
That the committee express its concern about the progress made towards the goal of a Canada without barriers by 2040, and that it report its opinion to the House.Peter Fragiskatos moved, — That the motion be amended by:
- adding before the words “the committee express” the following: “That, pursuant to Standing Order 108(2)”.
- replacing all the words after the words “the committee express” with the words “its concern about the progress made towards the goal of a Canada without barriers by 2040, and undertake a study of no less than 3 meetings to review the government’s progress towards meeting the goal of a Barrier Free Canada by 2040; That the committee report its findings and recommendations to the House; and that pursuant to Standing Order 109, the committee request that the government table a comprehensive response to the report”.
Debate arose thereon.
Louise Chabot moved, — That the amendment be amended by:
- replacing the words “3 meetings” with the words “2 meetings”.
- deleting the words “to review the government’s progress towards”.
- by adding the word “on” before the word “meeting”.
Debate arose thereon.
The question was put on the subamendment of Louise Chabot and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Louise Chabot, Chad Collins, Michael Coteau, Rosemarie Falk, Michelle Ferreri, Peter Fragiskatos, Tracy Gray, Wayne Long, Anna Roberts, Tony Van Bynen, Bonita Zarrillo — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
Tracy Gray moved, — That the amendment be amended by:
- replacing the words “on meeting” with the words “to study the progress towards”.
- adding after the words “Barrier Free Canada by 2024;” the following: “that the committee invite the Minister of Diversity, Inclusion and Persons with Disabilities, the Auditor General of Canada, Canada’s Chief Accessibility Officer, Canada’s Accessibility Commissioner, disability advocates, and federally-regulated industry representatives;”.
Debate arose thereon.
The question was put on the subamendment of Tracy Gray and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Louise Chabot, Chad Collins, Michael Coteau, Rosemarie Falk, Michelle Ferreri, Peter Fragiskatos, Tracy Gray, Wayne Long, Anna Roberts, Tony Van Bynen, Bonita Zarrillo — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
Debate arose thereon.
At 8:40 a.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 8:42 a.m., the sitting resumed.
The question was put on the amendment of Peter Fragiskatos, as amended, and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Louise Chabot, Chad Collins, Michael Coteau, Rosemarie Falk, Michelle Ferreri, Peter Fragiskatos, Tracy Gray, Wayne Long, Anna Roberts, Tony Van Bynen, Bonita Zarrillo — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
The committee resumed consideration of the motion, as amended, of Rosemarie Falk, — That, pursuant to Standing Order 108(2) the committee express its concern about the progress made towards the goal of a Canada without barriers by 2040, and undertake a study of no less than 2 meetings to study the progress towards the goal of a Barrier Free Canada by 2040; that the committee invite the Minister of Diversity, Inclusion and Persons with Disabilities, the Auditor General of Canada, Canada’s Chief Accessibility Officer, Canada’s Accessibility Commissioner, disability advocates, and federally-regulated industry representatives; That the committee report its findings and recommendations to the House; and that pursuant to Standing Order 109, the committee request that the government table a comprehensive response to the report.
The debate continued.
Michael Coteau moved, — That the motion be amended by replacing the words “express its concern” with the words “to study”.
Debate arose thereon.
RULING BY THE CHAIR
The Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible on the grounds that the Committee has already adopted the text being amended.
The question was put on the motion, as amended, and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Louise Chabot, Chad Collins, Michael Coteau, Rosemarie Falk, Michelle Ferreri, Peter Fragiskatos, Tracy Gray, Wayne Long, Anna Roberts, Tony Van Bynen, Bonita Zarrillo — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
Andréanne Larouche made a statement.
At 9:07 a.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 9:15 a.m., the sitting resumed.
James Janeiro, Gisèle Tassé-Goodman, and Arthur Sweetman made statements and answered questions.
Bonita Zarrillo moved, — That the committee write to Minister Freeland to highlight her mandate to convert the Canada Caregiver Credit to a refundable tax-free benefit, and ask that it be part of the upcoming Spring budget so that Canadians who care for their loved ones are also looked after.
RULING BY THE CHAIR
The Chair ruled the motion inadmissible.
At 10:15 a.m., the committee adjourned to the call of the Chair.