Figure D: Summary of comparative analysis of temporary and permanent committee rooms, by key criteria
| Extent to which criteria are met | ||
|---|---|---|
| Key criteria | Temporary solution (Wellington Building) | Permanent solution (Committee Building) |
| Location | No | Yes |
| Security | No | Yes |
| Functional Program | In Part | Yes |
| Operational Requirements | In Part | Yes |
| IT Infrastructure | In Part | Yes |
| Flexibility | No | Yes |
| Quality of Spaces | In Part | Yes |
| Architectural Design Qualities | In Part | Yes |
| Minimal Impact of Construction | No | Yes |
| Building Self-Sufficient | No | Yes |
| Consequences on renovation project | ||
|---|---|---|
| Key criteria | Temporary solution (Wellington Building) | Permanent solution (Committee Building) |
| Project Schedule | Planning and Construction 1999-2002 (2 years) | Planning and Construction 1999-2004 (4 years) |
| Impact on Renovation Program | Interior renovation to West Block could start in 2002; exterior repair of the West Block presently being addressed | Interior renovation to West Block could start in 2004; exterior repair of West Block presently being addressed |
| Cost | $13 to $18 million: temporary solution (plus$50 million for eventual permanent solution) | $50 million: rental savings to PWGSC of$800,000 a year40 |
| TOTAL COST | $63 to $68 million | $50 million, less annual savings of $800,000 a year |