AGRI Committee Meeting
Notices of Meeting include information about the subject matter to be examined by the committee and date, time and place of the meeting, as well as a list of any witnesses scheduled to appear. The Evidence is the edited and revised transcript of what is said before a committee. The Minutes of Proceedings are the official record of the business conducted by the committee at a sitting.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
Minutes of Proceedings
Conservative
Bloc Québécois
Alistair MacGregor moved, — That, pursuant to Standing Order 108(2), the Committee undertake a study on profit-driven inflation in the grocery sector and the costs of groceries going up while large chains are making record profits; that the committee examine the record profits of large grocery chains and their CEOs in relation to employee wages and the cost of groceries in Canada; that the committee also examine the ability of large grocery chains leveraging their size to cut into the earnings of Canadians farmers; that the committee invite witnesses with specific knowledge on profit-driven inflation and affected stakeholders from the industry, including grocer CEOs, economists, unions and farmers or representative organizations; that no fewer than six meetings are set aside to hear from witnesses; that the committee report its findings to the House and that, pursuant to Standing Order 109, the Government table a comprehensive response to the report.
Yves Perron moved, — That the motion be amended by replacing the words “profit-driven inflation in the grocery sector and the cost of groceries in Canada; that the committee also examine the ability of large grocery chains leveraging their size to cut into the earnings of Canadians farmers; that the committee invite witnesses with specific knowledge on profit-driven inflation and affected stakeholders from the industry, including grocer CEOs, economists, unions and farmers or representative organizations; that no fewer than six” with the words “inflation in the grocery sector; that the committee examine the profits of large grocery chains and the cost of groceries in Canada; that the committee also examine the supply mechanisms with the producers and transformers; that the committee invite witnesses with specific knowledge on inflation, including grocer CEOs, economists, unions and farmers or representative organizations; that no fewer than four”.
John Barlow moved, — That the amendment be amended by adding after the words “set aside to hear from witnesses;” the following: “that the committee commence the study after clause-by-clause on C-234 is completed”.
At 5:02 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 5:27 p.m., the sitting resumed.
By unanimous consent, the subamendment was withdrawn.
By unanimous consent, the amendment was withdrawn.
By unanimous consent, the motion was withdrawn.
Alistair MacGregor moved, — That, pursuant to Standing Order 108(2), the Committee undertake a study on inflation in the food supply chain and the cost of groceries going up, while large chains are making profits; that the committee examine the profits of large grocery chains in relation to employee wages and the cost of groceries in Canada; that the committee also examine the ability of large grocery chains to leverage their size to cut into the earnings of Canadian farmers; that the committee explore ways in which the food supply chain can help reduce rising food costs, and that the committee invite witnesses with specific knowledge on inflation and affected stakeholders from the industry, including grocer and food supply chain executives, economists, unions and farmers or representative organizations; that no fewer than four meetings are set aside to hear from witnesses; that the committee commence the study after clause-by-clause on C-234 is completed; that the committee report its finding to the House and that, pursuant to Standing Order 109, the Government table a comprehensive response to the report.
Yves Perron moved, — That the motion be amended by replacing the word “six” with the word “four”.
After debate, the question was put on the amendment of Yves Perron and it was agreed to.
After debate, the question was put on the motion, as amended, and it was agreed to.
The motion, as amended, read as follows:
That, pursuant to Standing Order 108(2), the Committee undertake a study on inflation in the food supply chain and the cost of groceries going up, while large chains are making profits; that the committee examine the profits of large grocery chains in relation to employee wages and the cost of groceries in Canada; that the committee also examine the ability of large grocery chains to leverage their size to cut into the earnings of Canadian farmers; that the committee explore ways in which the food supply chain can help reduce rising food costs, and that the committee invite witnesses with specific knowledge on inflation and affected stakeholders from the industry, including grocer and food supply chain executives, economists, unions and farmers or representative organizations; that no fewer than four meetings are set aside to hear from witnesses; that the committee commence the study after clause-by-clause on C-234 is completed; that the committee report its finding to the House and that, pursuant to Standing Order 109, the Government table a comprehensive response to the report.
On motion of Yves Perron, it was agreed, — That the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food set aside two of the meetings scheduled for the study on the environmental contribution of agriculture to study exclusively the problem of bee mortality, identify its causes and make relevant recommendations to the government; that these meetings be deemed to be included in the main study on the environmental contribution of agriculture; that these meetings take place after the Christmas break; and that the Committee report to the House on this issue within the planned report on the environmental contribution of agriculture.
The witnesses made statements and answered questions.
At 6:36 p.m., the committee adjourned to the call of the Chair.