Rules of Debate / Miscellaneous

Reflections on a vote

Debates pp. 402-3

Background

During debate on the Address in Reply to the Speech from the Throne, Mr. Winch (Vancouver East) raised a question of privilege alleging that in his speech, Mr. Roy (Timmins) had cast reflections on the way NDP Members had voted on the War Measures Act, and objected to the implication that NDP Members had "aligned themselves with the murderers in Quebec". Mr. Winch demanded an apology and a retraction of the remarks. The Acting Speaker (Mr. Laniel) intervened and Mr. Roy withdrew those remarks that contravened the rules of the House. Later, Mr. Winch again rose on a point of order, objecting to Mr. Roy's implication that murderers had been supported by socialists "wherever they may sit". Once again the Chair intervened to caution Mr. Roy that possible references to Members of Parliament in this context are unacceptable.

Issue

Can a Member criticize a vote taken in the House?

Decision

No. No Member may reflect on any vote of the House, except for the purpose of moving that such vote be rescinded.

Reasons given by the Acting Speaker

A Member "may comment on the situation and the events that have occurred, but he may not be permitted to reflect on the vote taken by this House or any position taken by Members of the House".

Sources cited

Standing Order 35.

References

Debates, October 20, 1970, pp. 401-2.