Skip to main content

House Publications

The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication

Notice Paper

No. 310

Tuesday, May 7, 2024

10:00 a.m.


Introduction of Government Bills

Notices of Recommendations

An Act respecting countering foreign interference
Recommendation
(Pursuant to Standing Order 79(2))
Her Excellency the Governor General recommends to the House of Commons the appropriation of public revenue under the circumstances, in the manner and for the purposes set out in a measure entitled “An Act respecting countering foreign interference”.
Royal recommendation — notice given Monday, May 6, 2024, by the Minister of Public Safety, Democratic Institutions and Intergovernmental Affairs.

Introduction of Private Members' Bills

Notices of Motions (Routine Proceedings)

Questions

Q-26952 — May 6, 2024 — Ms. Ashton (Churchill—Keewatinook Aski) — With regard to individuals who were made to repay or whose COVID era benefits such as the Canada Emergency Response Benefit, the Canada Emergency Student Benefit, the Canada Recovery Benefit, the Canada Recovery Caregiving Benefit, the Canada Recovery Sickness Benefit or the Canada Worker Lockdown Benefit were clawed back by the Canada Revenue Agency: (a) how many of these individuals, broken down by province and territory, and by income level, were (i) the only parent of a one-parent family, (ii) Indigenous, broken down by First Nations people, status and non-status, Metis and Inuit, (iii) people living below the poverty line, (iv) people on disability, (v) individuals aged 65 or older; (b) how much money was repaid or clawed back, broken down by individuals who were (i) the only parent of a one-parent family, (ii) Indigenous, broken down by First Nations people, status and non-status, Metis and Inuit, (iii) people living below the poverty line, (iv) people on disability, (v) aged 65 or older; and (c) what is the total number of Canadians and the total amount which was repaid or clawed back?
Q-26962 — May 6, 2024 — Ms. Normandin (Saint-Jean) — With regard to the government’s military spending since 2015: what are the annual amounts of investments and purchases of goods and services, broken down by province and territory?
Q-26972 — May 6, 2024 — Ms. Normandin (Saint-Jean) — With regard to defence procurement contracts since 2015: what have been the industrial and technological benefits, broken down by province and territory?
Q-26982 — May 6, 2024 — Mr. Boulerice (Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie) — With regard to federal funding and loans to Canada’s grocery sector, since January 1, 2006: how much federal funding has been provided to Loblaw Companies Limited and its subsidiaries, (i) No Frills, (ii) Real Canadian Superstore, (iii) Shoppers Drug Mart, (iv) Pharmaprix, (v) Provigo, (vi) Atlantic Superstore, (vii) Independent, (viii) T&T, broken down by company, year and type of funding?
Q-26992 — May 6, 2024 — Ms. Rempel Garner (Calgary Nose Hill) — With regard to the introduction of the new icon launched on May 3, 2024 by the Canadian Army: (a) when did the planning of this new icon begin; (b) how long did it take to design this icon; (c) what are the details of all contracts related to the design of the icon, including, (i) what outside contractors were involved, (ii) how much each contractor was paid, (iii) were any related contracts sole sourced and if so which ones, (iv) how long the contractor took to complete this work, (v) when this work was completed; (d) how much did it cost overall to design this icon; (e) how many staff, if any, were involved in the design of this icon; (f) which members of the Department of National Defence were involved in the approval of this icon; (g) who gave the final approval to utilize this icon; (h) what costs, if any, were associated with the promotion of this icon once the work was completed, in total and broken down by type of cost; (i) what are the costs (i) incurred to date, (ii) projected to be incurred, to initiate the use of the new icon, including but not limited to, the placement on advertisements, uniforms, stationary, broken down by category; (j) who approved the (i) communications plan, (ii) tweets, related to the release of the new icon; (k) what are the details of all contracts related to communicating the launch of this icon, including (i) what outside contractors were involved, (ii) how much each of these contractors were paid, (iii) whether any related contracts were sole-sourced, and, if so, which ones, (iv) how long it took them to complete this work, (v) when this work was completed; (l) what are the details of all contracts signed related to the promotion of this icon, including, (i) what outside contractors were involved, (ii) how much each of these contractors has been, or will be paid, (iii) whether any related contracts were sole-sourced, and, if so, which ones, (iv) how long it took them to complete this work, (v) when this work was completed, (vi) whether any advertising was purchased, and, if so, how much and on which platforms; (m) what are the details of all contracts related to the surveys, focus testing, public opinion testing, or any other research about the new icon, including, (i) what outside contractors were involved, (ii) how much each of these contractors were paid, (iii) whether any related contracts were sole-sourced, and, if so, which ones, (iv) how long it took them to complete this work, (v) when this work was completed; (n) how many staff, if any, were involved in the surveys, focus testing, public opinion testing, or any other research about the new icon; and (o) for each focus group or public opinion research that was conducted, (i) what questions were asked, (ii) what topics were analyzed, (iii) what were the results?

Notices of Motions for the Production of Papers

Business of Supply

Government Business

Private Members' Notices of Motions

Private Members' Business

C-270 — April 9, 2024 — Resuming consideration of the motion of Mr. Viersen (Peace River—Westlock), seconded by Ms. Rempel Garner (Calgary Nose Hill), — That Bill C-270, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (pornographic material), be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights.
Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by:
Ms. Lewis (Haldimand—Norfolk) — April 29, 2022
Mr. Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan) — May 7, 2022
Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot) — June 2, 2022
Mr. Muys (Flamborough—Glanbrook) — June 13, 2022
Mr. Falk (Provencher) and Mr. Majumdar (Calgary Heritage) — March 18, 2024
Ms. Sgro (Humber River—Black Creek) — March 19, 2024
Mrs. Roberts (King—Vaughan), Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), Mr. Calkins (Red Deer—Lacombe), Mrs. Thomas (Lethbridge), Mrs. Wagantall (Yorkton—Melville) and Mrs. Block (Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek) — March 21, 2024
Mr. Vuong (Spadina—Fort York) and Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — March 22, 2024
Ms. Larouche (Shefford) — April 2, 2024
Mr. Shields (Bow River) — April 8, 2024
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — April 9, 2024
Debate — one hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1).
Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1).

2 Response requested within 45 days