House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
|
|
|
Notice PaperNo. 325 Tuesday, September 25, 2018 10:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
|
Introduction of Government Bills |
|
Introduction of Private Members' Bills |
|
Notices of Motions (Routine Proceedings) |
|
Questions |
|
| Q-19332 — September 24, 2018 — Mr. McColeman (Brantford—Brant) — With regard to the Veterans Affairs Canada service standard of 16 weeks in regards to decisions for disability benefit applicants for the 2017-18 fiscal year, or the last year in which statistics are available: how many and what percentage of applications received a decision within (i) the 16-week standard, (ii) between 16-26 weeks, (iii) greater than 26 weeks (6 months), (iv) greater than a year? |
| Q-19342 — September 24, 2018 — Mr. Lloyd (Sturgeon River—Parkland) — With regard to the logo for the government’s campaign for a seat on the UN Security Council in 2021-22: (a) what are the total expenditures related to the development, design, or promotion of the logo; and (b) what is the breakdown of (a) by individual expenditure? |
| Q-19352 — September 24, 2018 — Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge) — With regard to the delay in the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion construction: (a) what is the amount the government (i) has paid or, (ii) is expected or projected to pay contractors or sub-contractors in penalties as a result of the delay; and (b) what is the breakdown of (a) by vendor? |
| Q-19362 — September 24, 2018 — Mrs. Zahid (Scarborough Centre) — With regard to the National Joint Council’s Relocation Directive, which reimburses federal employees when relocating for work, for the calendar years 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015: (a) how many employees, agents, or contractors of the federal government made claims for relocation funding each year, broken down by government department or agency; (b) how many employees, agents, or contractors of the federal government were provided with reimbursement for relocation each year, broken down by government department or agency; (c) in the instances where relocation funding was provided, how many instances arose from employer-requested relocation in each year; (d) in the instances where relocation funding was provided, how many instances arose from employee-requested relocation in each year; (e) what was the annual aggregate amount in Canadian dollars spent by each government agency or department in remitting relocation funding, broken down by the benefit categories outlined in appendix B of the National Joint Council’s Relocation Directive; (f) which employees, agents, or contractors of the federal government received relocation funding in each year, itemized to include their agency or department, their job title, the amount of relocation funding remitted, broken down by the benefit categories outlined in appendix B of the National Joint Council’s Relocation Directive, and where the individual was relocated from and to; (g) what is the aggregate amount of funding, across all government departments and agencies, remitted in each year under the Relocation Directive’s benefit categories that pertain to real estate commission and realtor fees; (h) what is the aggregate amount of funding, across all government departments and agencies, remitted in each year under the Relocation Directive’s benefit categories that pertain to home equity loss; and (i) what is the aggregate amount of funding, across all government departments and agencies, remitted in each year under the Relocation Directive’s benefit categories that pertain to mortgages, mortgage default insurance, and mortgage paydown penalties? |
Notices of Motions for the Production of Papers |
|
Business of Supply |
|
Government Business |
|
Private Members' Notices of Motions |
|
| M-199 — September 24, 2018 — Mr. Eyking (Sydney—Victoria) — That, in the opinion of the House, the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities should examine the possibility and practicality of extending the maximum number of weeks of employment insurance sick benefits for those with long term illnesses and the implementation of an employment insurance premium reduction program; and that the Committee report its findings and recommendations to the House no later than six months from passage of this motion. |
| M-200 — September 24, 2018 — Ms. Harder (Lethbridge) — That the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities be instructed to undertake a study on: |
| (a) the benefits of Automatic Dependant Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B) in comparison to Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELT) to locate aircraft in distress; |
| (b) the improvement to aircraft safety for passenger, commercial and general aviation through the installation of a technology in which an aircraft’s position is determined via satellite navigation and periodically broadcast to a remote tracking system, such as ADS-B, and the benefits of making this technology the replacement for outdated ELT technology on general aviation aircraft currently required to be equipped with an ELT; |
| (c) the potential to amend the Canadian Air Regulations to include other technologies, such as ADS-B Out, as a mean to comply with mandatory requirements to alert Search and Rescue of a crash and to locate the aircraft; |
| (d) how Canada can develop more robust and, ultimately, foolproof emergency alert standards that would include the periodic broadcast of the aircraft’s position, as well as the ability to remotely detect an accident, should the transmitter be disabled in a crash; and |
| (e) the effectiveness of incentives, such as rebates, to accelerate the adoption of this technology in the general aviation community; |
| and that the committee report its findings to the House within six months of the adoption of this motion. |
Private Members' Business |
|
|
|
| 2 Response requested within 45 days |
|