Skip to main content

House Publications

The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication

Monday, December 3, 2012 (No. 190)


Report Stage of Bills

Bill C-42
An Act to amend the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts

Notices of Motions

Motion No. 1 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Garrison (Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca) — That Bill C-42 be amended by deleting Clause 1.
Motion No. 2 — November 21, 2012 — Mr. Garrison (Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca) — That Bill C-42 be amended by deleting Clause 22.

Bill C-43
An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act

Notices of Motions

Motion No. 1 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Sims (Newton—North Delta) — That Bill C-43 be amended by deleting Clause 1.
Motion No. 2 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-43 be amended by deleting Clause 5.
Motion No. 3 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-43, in Clause 5, be amended by replacing line 14 on page 2 with the following:
“must answer truthfully all questions that are relevant to the application and that are put to them”
Motion No. 4 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-43 be amended by deleting Clause 8.
Motion No. 5 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-43 be amended by deleting Clause 9.
Motion No. 6 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-43 be amended by deleting Clause 10.
Motion No. 7 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-43 be amended by deleting Clause 16.
Motion No. 8 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-43 be amended by deleting Clause 24.

Bill C-45
A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 29, 2012 and other measures
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(5), the Speaker selected and grouped for debate the following motions:
Group No. 1 -- Motions Nos. 1, 3, 7, 9, 11, 18, 22, 25, 26, 29, 30, 32, 34 to 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 61, 63 to 65, 74, 78, 83, 84, 95 to 97, 99 to 106, 108 to 116, 131, 136, 138 to 140, 142 to 147, 151, 153, 155, 157 to 160 and 162.
Group No. 2 -- Motions Nos. 163 to 237, 240, 242, 243, 245, 246, 248, 249, 253, 254, 278 to 282, 286 to 289, 292 to 297, 299, 300, 302 to 341, 344 to 357, 361 to 366, 368 to 386, 389, 390, 392 to 402, 404, 405, 407, 409 to 411, 415, 419, 422, 423, 426, 428, 438, 440, 442, 443, 445, 446, 448, 449, 454 to 461, 463 to 467, 469 to 495, 497 to 575, 577 to 583, 586 to 592, 594 to 608 and 610 to 667.
Statement and selection by Speaker — see Debates of November 29, 2012.

Resuming Debate

Group No. 1
Motion No. 1 -- Question put separately. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 3, 22, 25, 26, 34 to 38, 61, 63 to 65, 95, 96, 99 to 106, 108 to 110, 114, 115, 139, 142 to 147, 155, 157 to 160 and 162.
Motion No. 29 -- Question put only if Motion No. 1 is negatived.
Motion No. 30 -- Question put only if Motion No. 1 is negatived.
Motion No. 151 -- Question put only if Motion No. 1 is negatived. Its vote also applies to Motion No. 153.
Motion No. 7 -- Question put separately. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 9, 11, 18, 32, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 74, 97, 111 to 113, 116, 131, 136, 138 and 140.
Motion No. 78 -- Question put only if Motion No. 7 is negatived.
Motion No. 83 -- Question put only if Motion No. 7 is negatived.
Motion No. 84 -- Question put only if Motion No. 7 is negatived.
Motion No. 1 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 1.
Motion No. 3 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 2.
Motion No. 7 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 3.
Motion No. 9 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 4.
Motion No. 11 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 5.
Motion No. 18 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 6.
Motion No. 22 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 7.
Motion No. 25 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 8.
Motion No. 26 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 9.
Motion No. 29 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by deleting lines 12 and 13 on page 14.
Motion No. 30 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by replacing line 3 on page 15 with the following:
“before 2020, or”
Motion No. 32 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 10.
Motion No. 34 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 11.
Motion No. 35 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 12.
Motion No. 36 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 13.
Motion No. 37 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 14.
Motion No. 38 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 15.
Motion No. 40 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 16.
Motion No. 42 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 17.
Motion No. 44 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 18.
Motion No. 46 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 19.
Motion No. 48 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 20.
Motion No. 50 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 21.
Motion No. 52 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 22.
Motion No. 61 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 23.
Motion No. 63 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 24.
Motion No. 64 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 25.
Motion No. 65 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 26.
Motion No. 74 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 27.
Motion No. 78 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 17 on page 35 with the following:
“(a.1) 19% of the amount by which the”
Motion No. 83 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), seconded by Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting line 14 on page 38 to line 11 on page 39.
Motion No. 84 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), seconded by Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 22 on page 38 to line 11 on page 39 with the following:
“scribed offshore region, and that is acquired after March 28, 2012, 10%.”
Motion No. 95 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 28.
Motion No. 96 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 29.
Motion No. 97 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 30.
Motion No. 99 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 31.
Motion No. 100 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 32.
Motion No. 101 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 34.
Motion No. 102 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 36.
Motion No. 103 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 37.
Motion No. 104 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 38.
Motion No. 105 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 39.
Motion No. 106 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 40.
Motion No. 108 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 41.
Motion No. 109 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 42.
Motion No. 110 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 43.
Motion No. 111 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 44.
Motion No. 112 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 45.
Motion No. 113 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 46.
Motion No. 114 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 47.
Motion No. 115 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 48.
Motion No. 116 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 49.
Motion No. 131 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 50.
Motion No. 136 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 51.
Motion No. 138 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 52.
Motion No. 139 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 53.
Motion No. 140 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 54.
Motion No. 142 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 55.
Motion No. 143 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 56.
Motion No. 144 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 58.
Motion No. 145 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 59.
Motion No. 146 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 60.
Motion No. 147 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 62.
Motion No. 151 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska), seconded by Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 62, be amended by replacing line 26 on page 134 with the following:
“(b) 65% multiplied by the proportion that”
Motion No. 153 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska), seconded by Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 62, be amended by replacing line 30 on page 134 with the following:
“(c) 65% multiplied by the proportion that”
Motion No. 155 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 63.
Motion No. 157 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 64.
Motion No. 158 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 65.
Motion No. 159 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 67.
Motion No. 160 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 68.
Motion No. 162 — November 29, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 69.

Notices of Motions

Group No. 2
Motion No. 163 -- Question put separately. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 164 to 219.
Motion No. 220 -- Question put separately. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 221 to 229.
Motion No. 230 -- Question put separately. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 231 to 236.
Motion No. 237 -- Question put separately. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 240, 242, 245, 246 and 248.
Motion No. 243 -- Question put only if Motion No. 237 is negatived.
Motion No. 249 -- Question put separately. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 278 to 282.
Motion No. 253 -- Question put only if Motion No. 249 is negatived.
Motion No. 254 -- Question put only if Motion No. 249 is negatived.
Motion No. 286 -- Question put separately. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 287 to 289.
Motion No. 292 -- Question put separately. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 293 to 296, 299, 300 and 302 to 308.
Motion No. 297 -- Question put only if Motion No. 292 is negatived.
Motion No. 309 -- Question put separately. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 310 to 339.
Motion No. 340 -- Question put separately. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 341, 344, 347 and 348.
Motion No. 345 -- Question put only if Motion No. 340 is negatived.
Motion No. 346 -- Question put only if Motion No. 340 is negatived.
Motion No. 349 -- Question put separately. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 350 to 354, 356, 357, 361 to 363, 365, 366 and 368 to 384.
Motion No. 355 -- Question put only if Motion No. 349 is negatived.
Motion No. 364 -- Question put only if Motion No. 349 is negatived.
Motion No. 385 -- Question put separately.
Motion No. 386 -- Question put separately.
Motion No. 389 -- Question put separately. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 395, 398, 399, 402, 404 and 407.
Motion No. 390 -- Question put only if Motion No. 389 is negatived. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 392 to 394, 396, 397, 400 and 401.
Motion No. 405 -- Question put only if Motion No. 389 is negatived.
Motion No. 409 -- Question put separately.
Motion No. 410 -- Question put separately. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 411, 419, 438, 440, 442, 455 to 461, 464 to 467 and 469 to 486.
Motion No. 415 -- Question put only if Motion No. 410 is negatived. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 422, 423, 426, 428, 443, 445, 446, 448, 449, 454 and 463.
Motion No. 487 -- Question put separately. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 488 to 494, 498, 502 to 504, 506, 509, 512 to 516 and 524 to 564.
Motion No. 495 -- Question put only if Motion No. 487 is negatived. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 497 and 499 to 501.
Motion No. 505 -- Question put only if Motion No. 487 is negatived. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 507, 508, 510 and 511.
Motion No. 517 -- Question put only if Motion No. 487 is negatived. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 518 to 523.
Motion No. 565 -- Question put separately. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 566 and 567.
Motion No. 568 -- Question put separately. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 569 to 575.
Motion No. 577 -- Question put separately. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 578 to 581, 583, 586 to 592, 594 to 608 and 610 to 612.
Motion No. 582 -- Question put only if Motion No. 577 is negatived.
Motion No. 613 -- Question put separately. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 614 to 663.
Motion No. 664 -- Question put separately. Its vote also applies to Motion No. 665.
Motion No. 666 -- Question put separately.
Motion No. 667 -- Question put separately.
Motion No. 163 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 99.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 164 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 100.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 165 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 101.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 166 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 102.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 167 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 103.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 168 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 104.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 169 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 105.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 170 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 106.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 171 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 107.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 172 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 108.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 173 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 109.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 174 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 110.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 175 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 111.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 176 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 112.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 177 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 113.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 178 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 114.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 179 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 115.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 180 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 116.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 181 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 117.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 182 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 118.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 183 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 119.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 184 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 120.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 185 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 121.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 186 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 122.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 187 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 123.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 188 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 124.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 189 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 125.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 190 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 126.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 191 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 127.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 192 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 128.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 193 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 129.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 194 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 130.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 195 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 131.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 196 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 132.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 197 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 133.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 198 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 134.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 199 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 135.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 200 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 136.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 201 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 137.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 202 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 138.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 203 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 139.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 204 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 140.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 205 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 141.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 206 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 142.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 207 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 143.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 208 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 144.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 209 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 145.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 210 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 146.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 211 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 147.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 212 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 148.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 213 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 149.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 214 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 150.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 215 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 151.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 216 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 152.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 217 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 153.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 218 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 154.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 219 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 155.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 220 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 156.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 221 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 157.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 222 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 158.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 223 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 159.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 224 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 160.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 225 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 161.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 226 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 162.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 227 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 163.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 228 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 164.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 229 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 165.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 230 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 166.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska) — November 27, 2012
Motion No. 231 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 167.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska) — November 27, 2012
Motion No. 232 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 168.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska) — November 27, 2012
Motion No. 233 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 169.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska) — November 27, 2012
Motion No. 234 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 170.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska) — November 27, 2012
Motion No. 235 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 171.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska) — November 27, 2012
Motion No. 236 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 172.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska) — November 27, 2012
Motion No. 237 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 173.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 240 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 174.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 242 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 175.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 243 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 175, be amended by replacing lines 23 to 27 on page 204 with the following:
“or any of its members in accordance with any treaty or land claims agreement or, consistent with inherent Aboriginal right, harvested by an Aboriginal organization or any of its members for traditional uses, including for food, social or ceremonial purposes;”
Motion No. 245 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 176.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 246 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 177.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 248 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 178.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 249 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 179.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 253 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 7 on page 208 the following:
“(3) The exemptions set out in subsection (1) apply if the person who proposes the construction of the bridge, parkway or any related work establishes, in relation to any work, undertaking or activity for the purpose of the construction of the bridge, parkway or any related work, that the work, undertaking or activity
(a) will not impede navigation;
(b) will not cause destruction of fish or harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of fish habitat within the meaning of the Fisheries Act; and
(c) will not jeopardize the survival or recovery of a species listed in the Species at Risk Act.
Motion No. 254 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 17 on page 208 the following:
“(3) The exemption set out in subsection (1) applies if the person who proposes the construction of the bridge, parkway or any related work establishes, in relation to any work, undertaking or activity for the purpose of that construction, that the construction will not present a risk of net negative environmental impact.”
Motion No. 278 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 180.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 279 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 181.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 280 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 182.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 281 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 183.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 282 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 184.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 286 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 206.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 287 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 207.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 288 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 208.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 289 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 209.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 292 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 219.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 293 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 220.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 294 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 221.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 295 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 222.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 296 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 223.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 297 — November 27, 2012 — Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 223, be amended by deleting lines 16 to 26 on page 239.
Motion No. 299 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 224.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska) — November 27, 2012
Motion No. 300 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 225.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 302 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 226.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 303 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 227.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 304 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 228.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 305 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 229.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 306 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 230.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 307 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 231.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 308 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 232.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 309 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 233.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 310 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 234.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 311 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 235.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 312 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 236.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 313 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 237.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 314 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 238.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 315 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 239.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 316 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 240.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 317 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 241.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 318 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 242.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 319 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 243.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 320 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 244.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 321 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 245.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 322 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 246.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 323 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 247.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 324 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 248.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 325 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 249.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 326 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 250.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 327 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 251.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 328 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 252.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 329 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 253.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 330 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 254.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 331 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 255.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 332 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 256.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 333 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 257.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 334 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 258.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 335 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 259.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 336 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 260.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 337 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 261.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 338 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 262.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 339 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 263.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 340 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 264.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 341 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 265.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 344 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 266.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 345 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 266, be amended by adding after line 6 on page 260 the following:
“(9) For greater certainty, any prescribed information given to the Agency in relation to any persons on board or expected to be on board a conveyance shall be subject to the Privacy Act.”
Motion No. 346 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 266, be amended by adding after line 6 on page 260 the following:
“12.2 Within six months after the day on which regulations made under subsection 12.1(8) come into force, the impact of section 12.1 and those regulations on privacy rights must be assessed and reported to each House of Parliament.”
Motion No. 347 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 267.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 348 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 268.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 349 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 269.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 350 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 270.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 351 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 271.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 352 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 272.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 353 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 273.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 354 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 274.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 355 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 274, be amended by adding after line 38 on page 262 the following:
“(3) The council shall, within four months after the end of each year, submit to the Minister a report on the activities of the council during that year.
(4) The Minister shall cause a copy of the report to be laid before each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days after the day on which the Minister receives it.
(5) The Minister shall send a copy of the report to the lieutenant governor of each province immediately after a copy of the report is last laid before either House.
(6) For the purpose of this section, “sitting day” means a day on which either House of Parliament sits.”
Motion No. 356 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 275.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 357 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 276.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 361 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 277.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 362 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 278.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 363 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 279.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 364 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 279, be amended
(a) by replacing line 3 on page 265 with the following:
“47. (1) The Minister may, following public consultation, designate any”
(b) by replacing lines 8 to 15 on page 265 with the following:
“specified in this Act, exercise the powers and perform the”
Motion No. 365 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 280.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 366 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 281.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 368 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 282.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 369 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 283.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 370 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 284.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 371 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 285.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 372 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 286.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 373 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 287.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 374 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 288.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 375 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 289.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 376 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 290.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 377 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 291.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 378 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 292.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 379 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 293.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 380 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 294.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 381 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 295.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 382 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 296.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 383 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 297.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 384 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 298.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 385 — November 27, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 302, be amended by replacing lines 4 to 8 on page 271 with the following:
“9. (1) Except in instances where a province is pursuing any of the legitimate objectives referred to in Article 404 of the Agreement, namely public security and safety, public order, protection of human, animal or plant life or health, protection of the environment, consumer protection, protection of the health, safety and well-being of workers, and affirmative action programs for disadvantaged groups, the Governor in Council may, by order, for the purpose of suspending benefits of equivalent effect or imposing retaliatory measures of equivalent effect in respect of a province under Article 1709 of the Agreement, do any”
Motion No. 386 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 307.
Motion No. 389 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 308.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 390 — November 27, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 308, be amended by replacing line 29 on page 272 with the following:
“national in respect of whom there is reason to believe that he or she poses a specific and credible security threat must, before entering Canada, apply”
Motion No. 392 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 308, be amended by adding after line 5 on page 273 the following:
“(1.02) The Minister shall cause a copy of each proposed regulation made under subsection (1.01) to be laid before each House of Parliament, and each House shall refer the proposed regulation to the appropriate committee of that House.
(1.03) A regulation may not be made before the earliest of
(a) 30 sitting days after the proposed regulation is laid before Parliament,
(b) 160 calendar days after the proposed regulation is laid before Parliament, and
(c) the day after the day on which each appropriate committee has reported its findings with respect to the proposed regulation.
(1.04) The Minister shall take into account any report of the committee of either House. If a regulation does not incorporate a recommendation of the committee of either House, the Minister shall lay before that House a statement of the reasons for not incorporating it.
(1.05) A proposed regulation that has been laid before Parliament need not again be so laid prior to the making of the regulation, whether it has been altered or not.”
Motion No. 393 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 308, be amended by replacing line 5 on page 273 with the following:
“system or officer, and any personal information relating to the authorization may only be disclosed in accordance with the Privacy Act.”
Motion No. 394 — November 27, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 308, be amended by adding after line 5 on page 273 the following:
“(1.02) No private security company shall be involved in the collection, dissemination, retention or disposal of private information obtained for the purposes of the electronic authorization system referred to in subsection (1.01).”
Motion No. 395 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 309.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 396 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 309, be amended by adding after line 12 on page 273 the following:
“(4) Within six months after the day on which the regulations relating to electronic travel authorizations referred to in subsection 11(1.01) come into force, the impact of such authorizations on privacy rights must be assessed and the assessment reported to each House of Parliament.”
Motion No. 397 — November 27, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 309, be amended by adding after line 12 on page 273 the following:
“(4) Regulations relating to electronic authorizations referred to in subsection 11(1.01) shall not be made earlier than two years of the coming into force of this subsection to allow for consultation with the tourism industry and other interested parties to assess the potential impact of the regulations on that industry.”
Motion No. 398 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 310.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 399 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 311.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — November 27, 2012
Motion No. 400 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 311, be amended by replacing line 24 on page 273 with the following:
“subsections 11(1) and (1.01), other than those for which an authorization is issued by the system and those”
Motion No. 401 — November 27, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 311, be amended by adding after line 33 on page 273 the following:
“(1.01) This section ceases to have effect with respect to electronic travel authorizations referred to in subsection 11(1.01) at the end of the fifteenth sitting day of Parliament after December 31, 2016 unless, before the end of that day, the application of this section is extended by a resolution passed, by both Houses of Parliament, that this section continues to be in force.”
Motion No. 402 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 312.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 404 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 313.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 405 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 313, be amended by deleting lines 15 to 24 on page 274.
Motion No. 407 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 314.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 409 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 315.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 410 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 316.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 411 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 317.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 415 — November 28, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 317, be amended by adding after line 22 on page 277 the following:
“(7) Section 2 of the Act is renumbered as subsection 2(1) and is amended by adding the following:
(2) For the purposes of this Act, when considering if a decision is in the public interest, the Minister shall take into account, as primary consideration, whether it would protect the public right of navigation, including the exercise, safeguard and promotion of that right.”
Motion No. 419 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 318.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 422 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by adding after line 7 on page 279 the following:
“(f) the importance of that navigable water to Aboriginal people for traditional and other uses. ”
Motion No. 423 — November 27, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by adding after line 7 on page 279 the following:
“(4.1) For the purposes of this Act, a bridge, boom, dam or causeway is deemed to have been determined by the Minister to be a work that substantially interferes with navigation.”
Motion No. 426 — November 27, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by adding after line 38 on page 279 the following:
“(10) All works that the Minister has determined under this section are likely to substantially interfere with navigation are deemed to be physical activities designated by regulations made under paragraph 84(a) of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 and linked to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency.”
Motion No. 428 — November 27, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by adding after line 7 on page 280 the following:
“(2.1) If the Minister did not require from the owner the deposit of information and publication of a notice under paragraph 5(6)(b), the Minister must require from the owner the deposit of the plans of the proposed work, of a description of the proposed site and of any other information specified by the Minister in the local land registry or land titles office or in any other place specified by the Minister and the publication of a notice containing the information in the Canada Gazette and in two newspapers published in or near the locality where the proposed work is to be constructed.
(2.2) The notice referred to in subsection (2.1) shall invite any interested person to provide written comments to the Minister within 30 days after its publication.”
Motion No. 438 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 319.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 440 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 320.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 442 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 321.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 443 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by deleting lines 23 to 30 on page 288.
Motion No. 445 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by replacing line 9 on page 290 with the following:
“(a) designating any works, other than bridges, booms, dams and causeways, as minor works;”
Motion No. 446 — November 27, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by replacing lines 11 and 12 on page 290 with the following:
“navigable waters, in whole or in part, other than a river that is part of the Canadian Heritage Rivers System or that provides habitat for any wildlife species at risk set out in Schedule 1 of the Species at Risk Act;”
Motion No. 448 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by adding after line 24 on page 290 the following:
“(2.1) Before making any order under paragraph (2)(a), the Minister shall assess the likely environmental effects of those works.
(2.2) Before making any order under paragraph (2)(b), the Minister shall take into account
(a) the ecological value of that navigable water;
(b) the utility of that navigable water for the purposes of fishing and hunting; and
(c) the importance of that navigable water to Aboriginal people for traditional and other uses.
(2.3) The Minister shall post a summary of the assessments made under subsections (2.1) and (2.2) on the Internet site of the Department of Transport.”
Motion No. 449 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by replacing lines 31 to 36 on page 290 with the following:
“28.1 (1) The Minister must table, in each House of Parliament, every order that he or she proposes to make under paragraphs 28(2)(a) and (b).
(2) Each proposed order that is tabled before a House must, on the day it is tabled, be referred by that House to an appropriate committee of that House, as determined by the rules of that House, and the committee may conduct inquiries or public hearings with respect to the proposed order and report its findings to that House.
(3) A proposed order that has been tabled pursuant to subsection (1) may be made
(a) on the expiration of 30 sitting days after it was last tabled in either House; or
(b) if, with respect to each House,
(i) the committee reports to the House, or
(ii) the committee decides not to conduct inquiries or public hearings.
(4) For the purpose of this section, “sitting day” means a day on which either House sits.”
Motion No. 454 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by deleting lines 22 to 43 on page 291.
Motion No. 455 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 322.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 456 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 323.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 457 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 324.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 458 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 325.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 459 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 326.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 460 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 327.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 461 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 328.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 463 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 328, be amended by adding after line 12 on page 294 the following:
“RIGHT OF ACTION
39.01 An individual whose right of navigation in respect of any navigable waters has been interfered with, or will likely be interfered with, may bring a claim for relief in public nuisance without the consent of the Attorney General and without establishing special damages.”
Motion No. 464 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 329.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 465 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 330.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 466 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 331.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 467 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 332.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 469 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 333.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 470 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 334.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 471 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 335.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 472 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 336.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 473 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 337.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 474 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 338.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 475 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 339.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 476 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 340.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 477 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 341.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 478 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 342.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 479 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 343.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 480 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 344.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 481 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 345.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 482 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 346.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 483 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 347.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 484 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 348.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 485 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 349.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 486 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 350.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 487 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 351.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 488 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 352.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 489 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 353.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 490 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 354.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 491 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 355.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 492 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 356.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 493 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 357.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 494 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 358.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 495 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 358, be amended by replacing line 8 on page 309 with the following:
“reinspection of the grain, to the grain appeal tribunal for the Division or the chief grain”
Motion No. 497 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 358, be amended by replacing line 14 on page 309 with the following:
“appeal is given to the grain appeal tribunal for the Division or the chief grain inspector for”
Motion No. 498 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 359.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 499 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 359, be amended by replacing line 18 on page 309 with the following:
“41. (1) If an appeal is taken, the grain appeal tribunal for the Division or the chief grain”
Motion No. 500 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 359, be amended by replacing line 32 on page 309 with the following:
“(2) The decision of the grain appeal tribunal for the Division or the chief grain inspector”
Motion No. 501 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 359, be amended by replacing line 37 on page 309 with the following:
“conferred on him or her under subsection (1) provided that it is demonstrated that the delegate has no direct or indirect interest, financial or otherwise, in the outcome of the appeal.”
Motion No. 502 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 360.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 503 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 361.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 504 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 362.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 505 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 362, be amended by replacing line 16 on page 310 with the following:
“provide a security, in the form of a bond, for the purpose of”
Motion No. 506 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 363.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 507 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 363, be amended by replacing line 33 on page 310 with the following:
“provided a security as required by subsection”
Motion No. 508 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 363, be amended by replacing line 40 on page 310 with the following:
“provided a security as required by subsection”
Motion No. 509 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 364.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 510 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 364, be amended by replacing line 2 on page 311 with the following:
“believe that any security provided by a licensee”
Motion No. 511 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 364, be amended by replacing line 13 on page 311 with the following:
“provided by a licensee, and the security may be”
Motion No. 512 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 365.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 513 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 366.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 514 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 367.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 515 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 368.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 516 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 369.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 517 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended by replacing lines 37 and 38 on page 313 with the following:
“terminal elevator shall submit grain received into the elevator for an official weighing, in a manner authorized by the”
Motion No. 518 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended by replacing line 1 on page 314 with the following:
“authorized by the Commission who has been demonstrated to have no direct or indirect interest, financial or otherwise, in the grain and chosen”
Motion No. 519 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended by replacing line 26 on page 314 with the following:
“authorized by the Commission who has been demonstrated to have no direct or indirect interest, financial or otherwise, in the grain and chosen by”
Motion No. 520 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended
(a) by replacing line 40 on page 314 with the following:
“the grain appeal tribunal for the Division or the chief grain inspector for Canada for a”
(b) by replacing line 44 on page 314 with the following:
“prescribed portion of them, to the grain appeal tribunal for the Division or the chief grain”
Motion No. 521 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended by replacing line 24 on page 315 with the following:
“section provided that it is demonstrated that the delegate has no direct or indirect interest, financial or otherwise, in the decision.”
Motion No. 522 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended
(a) by replacing lines 19 and 20 on page 316 with the following:
“70.2 (1) An operator of a licensed”
(b) by replacing lines 23 and 24 on page 316 with the following:
“third party or cause it to be officially”
Motion No. 523 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended by replacing line 28 on page 316 with the following:
“Commission and chosen by the operator. A third party may not be authorized unless it is demonstrated that it has no direct or indirect interest, financial or otherwise, in the outcome of the weighing or inspection.”
Motion No. 524 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 370.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 525 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 371.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 526 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 372.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 527 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 373.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 528 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 374.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 529 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 375.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 530 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 376.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 531 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 377.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 532 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 378.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 533 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 379.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 534 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 380.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 535 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 381.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 536 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 382.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 537 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 383.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 538 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 384.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 539 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 385.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 540 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 386.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 541 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 387.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 542 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 388.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 543 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 389.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 544 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 390.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 545 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 391.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 546 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 392.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 547 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 393.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 548 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 394.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 549 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 395.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 550 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 396.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 551 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 397.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 552 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 398.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 553 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 399.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 554 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 400.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 555 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 401.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 556 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 402.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 557 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 403.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 558 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 404.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 559 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 405.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 560 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 406.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 561 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 407.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 562 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 408.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 563 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 409.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 564 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 410.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 565 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 411.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 566 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 412.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 567 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 413.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 568 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 425.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) and Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 569 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 426.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) and Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 570 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 427.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) and Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 571 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 428.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) and Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 572 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 429.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) and Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 573 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 430.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) and Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 574 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 431.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) and Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 575 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 432.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) and Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 577 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 433.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 578 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 434.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 579 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 435.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) and Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 580 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 436.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 581 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 437.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 582 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 437, be amended by deleting lines 25 to 34 on page 341.
Motion No. 583 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 438.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 586 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 439.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 587 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 440.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 588 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 441.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 589 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 442.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 590 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 443.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 591 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 444.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 592 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 445.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) and Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 594 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 446.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) and Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 595 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 447.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) and Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 596 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 448.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 597 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 449.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 598 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 450.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 599 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 451.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 600 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 452.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 601 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 453.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 602 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 454.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 603 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 455.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 604 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 456.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 605 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 457.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 606 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 458.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 607 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 459.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 608 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 460.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 610 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 461.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 611 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 462.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 612 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 463.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 613 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 464.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 614 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 465.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 615 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 466.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 616 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 467.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 617 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 468.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 618 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 469.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 619 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 470.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 620 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 471.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 621 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 472.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 622 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 473.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 623 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 474.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 624 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 475.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 625 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 476.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 626 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 477.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 627 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 478.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 628 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 479.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 629 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 480.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 630 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 481.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 631 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 482.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 632 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 483.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 633 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 484.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 634 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 485.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 635 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 486.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 636 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 487.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 637 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 488.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 638 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 489.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 639 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 490.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 640 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 491.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 641 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 492.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 642 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 493.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 643 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 494.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 644 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 495.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 645 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 496.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 646 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 497.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 647 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 498.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 648 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 499.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 649 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 500.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 650 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 501.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 651 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 502.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 652 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 503.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 653 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 504.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 654 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 505.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 655 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 506.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 656 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 507.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 657 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 508.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 658 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 509.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 659 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 510.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 660 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 511.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 661 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 512.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 662 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 513.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 663 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 514.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 664 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 515.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 665 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 516.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 666 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Schedule 1.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 667 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Schedule 2.

Bill C-377
An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (requirements for labour organizations)

Notices of Motions

Motion No. 1 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Hiebert (South Surrey—White Rock—Cloverdale) — That Bill C-377, in Clause 1, be amended by :
(a) replacing lines 1 to 7 on page 2 with the following:
“(2) Every labour organization and every labour trust shall, by way of electronic filing (as defined in subsection 150.1(1)) and within six months from the end of each fiscal period, file with the Minister an information return for the year, in prescribed form and containing prescribed information.
(3) The information return referred to”
(b) replacing lines 26 to 31 on page 2 with the following:
“assets — with all transactions and all disbursements, the cumulative value of which in respect of a particular payer or payee for the period is greater than $5,000, shown as separate entries along with the name of the payer and payee and setting out for each of those transactions and disbursements its purpose and description and the specific amount that has been paid or received, or that is to be paid or received, and including”
(c) replacing lines 33 to 35 on page 2 with the following:
“(ii) a statement of loans exceeding $250 receivable from officers, employees, members or businesses,”
(d) replacing line 4 on page 3 with the following:
“to officers, directors and trustees, to employees with compensation over $100,000 and to persons in positions of authority who would reasonably be expected to have, in the ordinary course, access to material information about the business, operations, assets or revenue of the labour organization or labour trust, including”
(e) replacing lines 11 to 14 on page 3 with the following:
“consideration provided,
(vii.1) a statement with a reasonable estimate of the percentage of time dedicated by persons referred to in subparagraph (vii) to each of political activities, lobbying activities and other non-labour relations activities,
(viii) a statement with the aggregate amount of disbursements to”
(f) replacing lines 22 to 25 on page 3 with the following:
“provided,
“(viii.1) a statement with a reasonable estimate of the percentage of time dedicated by persons referred to in subparagraph (viii) to each of political activities, lobbying activities and other non-labour relations activities,
(ix) a statement with the aggregate amount of disbursements on”
(g) replacing lines 33 to 40 on page 3 with the following:
“(xiii) a statement with the aggregate amount of disbursements on administration,
(xiv) a statement with the aggregate amount of disbursements on general overhead,
(xv) a statement with the aggregate amount of disbursements on organizing activities,
(xvi) statement with the aggregate amount of disbursements on collective bargaining activities,”
(h) replacing lines 1 and 2 on page 4 with the following:
“(xix) a statement with the aggregate amount of disbursements on legal activities, excluding information protected by solicitor-client privilege,
(xix.1) a statement of disbursements (other than disbursements included in a statement referred to in any of subparagraphs (iv), (vii), (viii) and (ix) to (xix)) on all activities other than those that are primarily carried on for members of the labour organization or labour trust, excluding information protected by solicitor-client privilege, and”
(i) replacing lines 4 to 13 on page 4 with the following:
“(c) a statement for the fiscal period listing the sales of investments and fixed assets to, and the purchases of investments and fixed assets from, non-arm’s length parties, including for each property a description of the property and its cost, book value and sale price;
(d) a statement for the fiscal period listing all other transactions with non-arm’s length parties; and
(e) in the case of a labour organization or”
(j) replacing line 29 on page 4 with the following:
“contained in the information return”
(k) replacing lines 33 to 35 on page 4 with the following:
“Internet site in a searchable format.
(5) For greater certainty, a disbursement referred to in any of subparagraphs (3)(b)(viii) to (xx) includes a disbursement made through a third party or contractor.
(6) Subsection (2) does not apply to
(a) a labour-sponsored venture capital corporation; and
(b) a labour trust the activities and operations of which are limited exclusively to the administration, management or investments of a deferred profit sharing plan, an employee life and health trust, a group sickness or accident insurance plan, a group term life insurance policy, a private health services plan, a registered pension plan or a supplementary unemployment benefit plan.
(7) Subsection (3) does not require the reporting of
(a) information, regarding disbursements and transactions of, or the value of investments held by, a labour trust (other than a trust described in paragraph (6)(b)), that is limited exclusively to the direct expenditures or transactions by the labour trust in respect of a plan, trust or policy described in paragraph (6)(b);
(b) the address of a person in respect of whom paragraph (3)(b) applies; or
(c) the name of a payer or payee in respect of a statement referred to in any of subparagraphs (3)(b)(i), (v), (ix), (xiii) to (xvi) and (xix).”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Jean (Fort McMurray—Athabasca) — November 30, 2012
Motion No. 2 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Hiebert (South Surrey—White Rock—Cloverdale) — That Bill C-377, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing line 5 on page 5 with the following:
“comply with that section, to a maximum of $25,000.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Jean (Fort McMurray—Athabasca) — November 30, 2012
Motion No. 3 — November 29, 2012 — Mr. Hiebert (South Surrey—White Rock—Cloverdale) — That Bill C-377, in Clause 3, be amended by replacing lines 6 to 8 on page 5 with the following:
“3. This Act applies in respect of fiscal periods that begin after the day that is six months after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Jean (Fort McMurray—Athabasca) — November 30, 2012