Skip to main content

House Publications

The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication

Tuesday, November 27, 2012 (No. 186)


Report Stage of Bills

Bill C-42
An Act to amend the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts

Notices of Motions

Motion No. 1 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Garrison (Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca) — That Bill C-42 be amended by deleting Clause 1.
Motion No. 2 — November 21, 2012 — Mr. Garrison (Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca) — That Bill C-42 be amended by deleting Clause 22.

Bill C-45
A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 29, 2012 and other measures

Notices of Motions

Motion No. 1 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 1.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 2 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing lines 4 and 5 on page 1 with the following:
“1. This Act may be cited as the Omnibus Act No.2, 2012.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 3 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 2.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 4 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 2, be amended by deleting lines 1 to 42 on page 2.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 5 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 2, be amended by deleting lines 1 to 4 on page 3.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 6 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 3.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 7 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 3, be amended by replacing line 14 on page 3 with the following:
“(2) Subsection (1) applies to the 2013 and”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 8 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 4.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 9 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 4, be amended by replacing line 10 on page 4 with the following:
“that begin after June 30, 2013.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 10 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 5.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 11 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 5, be amended by deleting line 31 on page 4 to line 18 on page 7.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 12 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 5, be amended by replacing lines 22 and 23 on page 5 with the following:
“(b) the amount becomes owing after June 30, 2013;”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 13 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 5, be amended by deleting lines 22 to 39 on page 7.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 14 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 5, be amended by replacing line 25 on page 7 with the following:
“incurred after June 30, 2013. However, any”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 15 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 5, be amended by replacing line 34 on page 7 with the following:
“on or before the day that is 730 days after the”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 16 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 5, be amended by replacing line 39 on page 7 with the following:
“begin, after June 30, 2013.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 17 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 6.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 18 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 6, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 9 with the following:
“and fiscal periods that end after June 30, 2013. However, in respect of acquisitions of”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 19 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 6, be amended by replacing line 14 on page 10 with the following:
“on July 1, 2013 and ends on the day that is”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 20 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 6, be amended by replacing line 15 on page 10 with the following:
“545 days after the day on which the ways and”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 21 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 7.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 22 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 7, be amended by replacing line 31 on page 11 with the following:
“that period in the amount of $500,000;”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 23 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 7, be amended(b) by deleting line 39 on page 10 to line 35 on page 12.(c) by deleting lines 8 and 9 on page 13.(d) by deleting lines 12 to 20 on page 13.
(a) by deleting lines 22 to 34 on page 10.
(b) by deleting line 39 on page 10 to line 35 on page 12.
(c) by deleting lines 8 and 9 on page 13.
(d) by deleting lines 12 to 20 on page 13.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 24 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 8.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 25 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 9.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 26 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by replacing lines 1 to 12 on page 14 with the following:
“9. (1) Paragraph 37(1)(b) of the Act is re-”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 27 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by deleting line 12 on page 14 to line 12 on page 16.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 28 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by deleting lines 12 and 13 on page 14.
Motion No. 29 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by replacing line 3 on page 15 with the following:
“before 2020, or”
Motion No. 30 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by deleting lines 13 and 14 on page 16.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 31 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 10.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 32 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 10, be amended by replacing lines 34 and 35 on page 16 with the following:
“(2) Subsection (1) comes into force on July 1, 2013.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 33 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 11.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 34 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 12.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 35 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 13.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 36 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 14.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 37 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 15.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 38 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 16.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 39 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 16, be amended by replacing lines 26 and 27 on page 20 with the following:
“(3) Subsections (1) and (2) come into force on July 1, 2013.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 40 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 17.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 41 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 17, be amended by replacing line 37 on page 20 with the following:
“that begin, after June 30, 2013.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 42 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 18.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 43 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 18, be amended by replacing lines 29 to 32 on page 23 with the following:
“made after August 13, 2013 other than a disposition made before 2014 pursuant to an obligation under a written agreement entered into before August 14, 2013 by parties that”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 44 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 19.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 45 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 19, be amended by replacing line 11 on page 24 with the following:
“into force on July 1, 2013.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 46 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 20.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 47 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 20, be amended by replacing line 34 on page 24 with the following:
“into force on July 1, 2013.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 48 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 21.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 49 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 21, be amended by replacing line 2 on page 26 with the following:
“of dispositions made after June 30, 2013.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 50 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 22.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 51 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 22, be amended by replacing line 5 on page 30 with the following:
“disposition made after June 30, 2013,”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 52 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 22, be amended by replacing line 8 on page 30 with the following:
“before August 14, 2013, the portion of”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 53 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 22, be amended by replacing line 29 on page 30 with the following:
“ship by a taxpayer before 2014 to a person”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 54 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 22, be amended by replacing lines 34 and 35 on page 30 with the following:
“into by the taxpayer before July 1, 2013. A taxpayer is not considered to be”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 55 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 22, be amended by replacing line 2 on page 31 with the following:
“into force on July 1, 2013, except that”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 56 — November 26, 2012 — [Affiliation] — That Bill C-45, in Clause 22, be amended by replacing line 6 on page 31 with the following:
“(a) before August 14, 2013; or”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 57 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 22, be amended by replacing line 11 on page 31 with the following:
“2014 pursuant to an obligation under a”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 58 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 22, be amended by replacing line 13 on page 31 with the following:
“August 14, 2013 by parties that deal with”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 59 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 23.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 60 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 24.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 61 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 25.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 62 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 26.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 63 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 19 on page 33 with the following:
“(i) for the 2013 taxation year, $70,000,”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 64 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 20 on page 33 with the following:
“(ii) for the 2014 taxation year, $60,000,”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 65 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 22 on page 33 with the following:
“(iii) for the 2015 taxation year, $50,000;”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 66 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 22 on page 33 with the following:
“(iii) for the 2015 taxation year, $79,999,”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 67 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 24 on page 33 with the following:
“(iv) for the 2016 taxation year, $40,000,
(v) for the 2017 taxation year, $30,000,
(vi) for the 2018 taxation year, $20,000, and
(vii) for the 2019 taxation year, $10,000; and
(b) for the 2020 and subsequent taxation”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 68 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 36 on page 33 with the following:
“(i) for the 2013 taxation year, 70%,”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 69 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 37 on page 33 with the following:
“(ii) for the 2014 taxation year, 60%, and”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 70 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 38 on page 33 with the following:
“(iii) for the 2015 taxation year, 50%; and”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 71 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 1 on page 34 with the following:
“(iv) for the 2016 taxation year, 40%,
(v) for the 2017 taxation year, 30%,
(vi) for the 2018 taxation year, 20%, and
(vii) for the 2019 taxation year, 10%; and
(b) for the 2020 and subsequent taxation”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 72 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 27.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) and Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 73 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing lines 5 to 26 on page 34 with the following:
“27. (1) The definition “first term shared-use-”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 74 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting line 26 on page 34 to line 5 on page 35.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 75 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 26 to 43 on page 36.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 76 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 35 on page 36 with the following:
“(ii) 99.99% of an expenditure described in”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 77 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 1 to 5 on page 37.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 78 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 6 to 11 on page 37.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 79 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting line 14 on page 38 to line 11 on page 39.
Motion No. 80 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 22 to 29 on page 43.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 81 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 30 to 39 on page 43.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 82 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting line 40 on page 43 to line 3 on page 44.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 83 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 4 to 7 on page 44.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 84 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 8 to 12 on page 44.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 85 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 13 to 29 on page 44.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 86 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 30 and 31 on page 44.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 87 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 6 to 36 on page 45.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 88 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 18 on page 45 with the following:
“taxation year and before 2017 is of the”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 89 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 31 on page 45 with the following:
“taxation year and before 2017 is of the”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 90 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 4 on page 46 with the following:
“(37) Subsections (23) and (28)”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 91 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 28.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 92 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 29.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 93 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 30.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 94 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 30, be amended by replacing lines 37 to 39 on page 50 with the following:
“after June 30, 2013.
(4) Subsection (2) comes into force on July 1, 2013.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 95 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 31.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 96 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 32.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 97 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 34.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 98 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 36.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 99 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 37.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 100 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 38.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 101 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 39.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 102 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 40.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 103 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 40, be amended by replacing line 7 on page 80 with the following:
“(2) Subsection (1) applies to the 2013 and”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 104 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 41.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 105 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 42.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 106 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 43.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 107 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 44.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 108 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 45.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 109 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 46.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 110 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 47.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 111 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 48.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 112 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 49.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 113 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 2 on page 99 with the following:
“time after June 30, 2013 in respect of a class”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 114 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 10 on page 99 with the following:
“June 30, 2013 and before that time by the”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 115 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing lines 37 and 38 on page 102 with the following:
“(i) the amount became owing after June 30, 2013, or”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 116 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 2 on page 103 with the following:
“July 1, 2013 and is a debt obligation”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 117 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 4 on page 103 with the following:
“after June 30, 2013 and at or before that”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 118 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by adding after line 5 on page 114 the following:
“(26) This section does not apply to a CRIC that is listed on a designated stock exchange.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 119 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 8 on page 114 with the following:
“that occur after June 30, 2013. However,”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 120 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 10 on page 114 with the following:
“actions that occur before 2014 between”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 121 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 22 on page 114 with the following:
“before July 1, 2013 between the”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 122 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing lines 30 and 31 on page 114 with the following:
“into between the parties before July 1, 2013, and”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 123 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 8 on page 115 with the following:
“730 days after the day on which this Act”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 124 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 26 on page 116 with the following:
“time after June 30, 2013 of any class of”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 125 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 35 on page 116 with the following:
“time after June 30, 2013 in respect of a class”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 126 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 4 on page 117 with the following:
“June 30, 2013 and before that time by the”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 127 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 50.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 128 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 50, be amended by replacing line 12 on page 122 with the following:
“that end after June 30, 2013, except that”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 129 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 50, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 122 with the following:
“(a) for taxation years that include July 1, 2013, the amount of each dividend”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 130 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 50, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 122 with the following:
“taxation year that are after June 30, 2013”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 131 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 50, be amended by replacing line 24 on page 122 with the following:
“(b) before August 14, 2013, subsection”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 132 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 51.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 133 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 51, be amended by replacing line 18 on page 125 with the following:
“June 30, 2013.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 134 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 52.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 135 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 53.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 136 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 54.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 137 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 54, be amended by replacing line 23 on page 128 with the following:
“transaction that occurs after June 30, 2013.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 138 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 55.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 139 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 56.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 140 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 58.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 141 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 59.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 142 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 60.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 143 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 62.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) and Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 144 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 62, be amended by replacing line 16 on page 134 with the following:
“that end after 2015, except that for taxation”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 145 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 62, be amended by replacing line 17 on page 134 with the following:
“years that begin before 2017 the reference to”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 146 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 62, be amended by replacing line 24 on page 134 with the following:
“year and before 2016 is of the number of”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 147 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 62, be amended by replacing line 28 on page 134 with the following:
“year and in 2016 is of the number of days”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 148 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 62, be amended by replacing line 32 on page 134 with the following:
“year and after 2016 is of the number of”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 149 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 63.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 150 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 63, be amended by deleting lines 34 to 39 on page 134.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 151 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 64.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 152 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 65.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 153 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 67.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 154 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 68.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 155 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 68, be amended by replacing line 29 on page 137 with the following:
“(2) Subsection (1) applies to the 2013 and”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 156 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 69.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 157 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 99.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 158 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 100.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 159 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 101.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 160 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 102.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 161 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 103.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 162 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 104.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 163 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 105.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 164 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 106.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 165 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 107.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 166 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 108.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 167 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 109.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 168 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 110.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 169 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 111.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 170 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 112.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 171 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 113.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 172 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 114.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 173 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 115.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 174 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 116.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 175 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 117.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 176 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 118.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 177 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 119.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 178 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 120.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 179 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 121.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 180 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 122.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 181 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 123.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 182 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 124.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 183 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 125.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 184 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 126.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 185 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 127.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 186 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 128.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 187 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 129.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 188 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 130.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 189 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 131.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 190 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 132.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 191 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 133.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 192 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 134.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 193 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 135.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 194 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 136.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 195 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 137.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 196 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 138.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 197 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 139.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 198 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 140.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 199 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 141.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 200 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 142.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 201 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 143.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 202 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 144.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 203 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 145.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 204 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 146.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 205 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 147.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 206 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 148.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 207 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 149.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 208 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 150.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 209 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 151.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 210 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 152.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 211 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 153.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 212 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 154.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 213 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 155.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 214 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 156.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 215 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 157.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 216 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 158.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 217 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 159.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 218 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 160.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 219 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 161.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 220 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 162.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 221 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 163.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 222 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 164.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 223 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 165.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 224 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 166.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 225 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 167.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 226 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 168.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 227 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 169.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 228 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 170.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 229 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 171.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 230 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 172.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 231 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 173.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 232 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing line 17 on page 203 with the following:
“equipment that”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 233 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing line 27 on page 203 with the following:
“weir or other fishing equipment that, in the”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 234 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 174.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 235 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 175.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 236 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 175, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 25 on page 204 with the following:
““Aboriginal”, in relation to a fishery, means a fishery for the harvesting of fish by an Aboriginal organization, or any of its members, for the purpose of using the fish as food or earning a moderate livelihood or for social or ceremonial purposes, and includes a traditional Aboriginal fishery, whether or not it is currently active, and an Aboriginal fishery recognized by a treaty or land”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 237 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 175, be amended by replacing lines 23 to 27 on page 204 with the following:
“or any of its members in accordance with any treaty or land claims agreement or, consistent with inherent Aboriginal right, harvested by an Aboriginal organization or any of its members for traditional uses, including for food, social or ceremonial purposes;”
Motion No. 238 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 175, be amended by adding after line 27 on page 204 the following:
“(2) Within five years after the definition “Aboriginal”, as enacted by subsection 133(3) of the Jobs, Growth and Long-term Prosperity Act, comes into force, a comprehensive review of the application and operation of the definition shall be undertaken, in consultation with representatives of Canada's Aboriginal peoples, by such committee of the House of Commons as may be designated or established by that House for that purpose.
(3) The committee referred to in subsection (2) shall, within a year after a review is undertaken pursuant to that subsection or within such further time as may be authorized by the House of Commons, submit a report on the review to Parliament, including a statement of any changes that the committee recommends.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 239 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 176.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 240 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 177.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 241 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 177, be amended by deleting line 30 on page 205 to line 11 on page 206.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 242 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 178.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 243 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 179.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 244 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 16 on page 206 with the following:
“179. The Detroit River International Crossing Act,”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 245 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing lines 22 and 23 on page 206 with the following:
“1. This Act may be cited as the Detroit River International Crossing Act.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 246 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 31 on page 206 with the following:
“approaches to the bridge, as the project is understood to exist on the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) and Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 247 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 7 on page 208 the following:
“(3) The exemptions set out in subsection (1) apply if the person who proposes the construction of the bridge, parkway or any related work establishes, in relation to any work, undertaking or activity for the purpose of the construction of the bridge, parkway or any related work, that the work, undertaking or activity
(a) will not impede navigation;
(b) will not cause destruction of fish or harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of fish habitat within the meaning of the Fisheries Act; and
(c) will not jeopardize the survival or recovery of a species listed in the Species at Risk Act.
Motion No. 248 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 17 on page 208 the following:
“(3) The exemption set out in subsection (1) applies if the person who proposes the construction of the bridge, parkway or any related work establishes, in relation to any work, undertaking or activity for the purpose of that construction, that the construction will not present a risk of net negative environmental impact.”
Motion No. 249 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 39 on page 208 with the following:
“published in the Canada Gazette and posted on the website of Transport Canada.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 250 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 11 on page 209 with the following:
“tion, they must file with the Minister, and receive his or her approval for, a plan that”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 251 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 17 on page 209 with the following:
“(2) The person must hold a public consultation and consult with the Minis-”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 252 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 18 on page 209 the following:
“(3) After the plan is filed with the Minister, it is posted on the website of Transport Canada.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 253 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 27 on page 209 with the following:
“with the Minister, and receive his or her approval for, a plan that includes all”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 254 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 31 on page 209 with the following:
“(2) The person must hold a public consultation and consult with the Minis-”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 255 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 40 on page 209 the following:
“(4) After the plan is filed with the Minister, it is posted on the website of Transport Canada.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 256 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 40 on page 209 the following:
“(4) Before a person begins to carry on any work, undertaking or activity for a purpose referred to in subsection (1) that is likely to affect fish habitat in an Aboriginal fishery, as defined in subsection 133(3) of the Jobs, Growth and Long-term Prosperity Act, the person must consult any Aboriginal organization whose members harvest fish from that habitat.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 257 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 6 on page 210 with the following:
“with the Minister, and obtain the Minister's approval for, a plan that includes all”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 258 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 9 on page 210 with the following:
“the residences of its individuals and the Minister must approve the plan.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 259 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing lines 10 and 11 on page 210 with the following:
“(2) The person must hold public consultations on the plan and consult with the Minister of the Environment before filing it.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 260 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 11 on page 210 the following:
“(2.1) The plan as approved by the Minister must be posted on the website of the Department of Transport.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 261 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 22 on page 210 with the following:
“construction, they must file with the Minister, and obtain the Minister's approval for, a”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 262 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 27 on page 210 with the following:
“to the construction and the Minister must approve the plan.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 263 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 27 on page 210 the following:
“(2) The person must hold public consultations on the plan and consult with conservation experts and the Minister of the Environment before filing the plan.
(3) The plan as approved by the Minister must be posted on the website of the Department of Transport.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 264 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 34 on page 210 with the following:
“the Minister, and obtain the Minister's approval for, a plan that includes all measures to”
Motion No. 265 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing lines 36 and 37 on page 210 with the following:
“(2) The person must hold public consultations on the plan and consult with the Windsor Port Authority before filing it.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 266 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 37 on page 210 the following:
(3) The plan as approved by the Minister must be posted on the website of the Department of Transport.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 267 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 7 on page 211 with the following:
“with the Minister and, when approved by the Minister, it”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 268 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 8 on page 211 the following:
“(4) The amended plan as approved by the Minister must be posted on the website of the Department of Transport.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 269 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 18 on page 211 with the following:
“apply to the designation, but the designation must be published in the Canada Gazette and posted on the website of the Department of Transport.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 270 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 9 on page 212 with the following:
“the Omnibus Act No. 2, 2012 is deemed to”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 271 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 8 on page 213 the following:
“(4) The agreement must be tabled in both Houses of Parliament and posted on the website of the Department of Transport.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 272 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing lines 28 to 30 on page 213 with the following:
“not more than $50,000; and
(b) in any other case, to a fine of not more than $5,000,000.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 273 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 17 on page 214 the following:
“29. The Minister must table annually in each House of Parliament a report on measures taken to ensure compliance with plans filed under sections 7 to 11, on agreements entered into by the Minister under section 22 and on the prosecution of offences under section 24.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 274 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 180.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 275 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 181.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 276 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 182.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 277 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 183.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 278 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 184.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 279 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 184, be amended by replacing line 41 on page 215 with the following:
“the work, undertaking or activity and the Minister must approve the plan.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 280 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 184, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 216 with the following:
“the work, undertaking or activity and the Minister must approve the plan.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 281 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 203, be amended by replacing lines 31 to 39 on page 225 with the following:
“subsection (1), whenever any Bill is introduced in the House of Commons to amend this Act in a manner that would in the opinion of the Chief Actuary materially affect any of the estimates contained in the most recent report made under that subsection, the Chief Actuary shall prepare a report as set out in subsection (3) and provide it to the Minister of Finance, who shall table that report before the House within five sitting days after receiving it.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 282 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 206.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 283 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 207.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 284 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 208.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 285 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 209.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 286 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 209, be amended by adding after line 22 on page 228 the following:
“(2) Within five years after this Division comes into force, a comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Division shall be undertaken, in consultation with representatives of the First Nations, by such committee of the House of Commons as may be designated or established by that House for that purpose.
(3) The committee referred to in subsection (2) shall, within a year after a review is undertaken pursuant to that subsection or within such further time as may be authorized by the House of Commons, submit a report on the review to Parliament, including a statement of any changes that the committee recommends.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 287 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 212, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 21 on page 233 with the following:
“after receiving it.
(8) If the Minister of Justice disagrees with the recommendations of the Commission, the response to the report shall provide the reasons.
(9) Within 30 days after the issuance of the response, the Minister of Justice shall try to resolve the disagreement with the Commission.
(10) The Minister of Justice shall cause the tabling in each House of Parliament of a report prepared by the Minister and the Commission.
(11) The report shall be referred by that House to a committee of that House that is designated or established by that House for the purpose of considering matters relating to justice.
(12) Following issuance of the response referred to in subsection (7) or the tabling of the report referred to in subsection (10), if applicable, the Minister of Justice shall, within a reasonable period, cause to be prepared and introduced a bill to implement the response or the report, as the case may be.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 288 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 219.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 289 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 220.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 290 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 221.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 291 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 222.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 292 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 223.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 293 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 223, be amended
(a) by replacing line 20 on page 239 with the following:
“the employee is entitled under this Part, twelve”
(b) by replacing line 24 on page 239 with the following:
“(b) in the case of any other complaint, twelve”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 294 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 224.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 295 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 225.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 296 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 225, be amended by adding after line 6 on page 244 the following:
“251.102 (1) The Minister shall, on or before December 31 next following the end of each fiscal year, prepare a report on the reviews conducted under 251.101(3) that includes the following information:
(a) the number of reviews where the payment order or the notice was confirmed;
(b) the number of reviews where the payment order or the notice was rescinded or varied; and
(c) an assessment of the length of time required to complete the reviews.
(2) The Minister must, during the fiscal year after the fiscal year for which the report is prepared, cause the report to be laid before each House of Parliament.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 297 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 226.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 298 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 227.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 299 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 228.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 300 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 229.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 301 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 230.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 302 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 231.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 303 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 232.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 304 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 233.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 305 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 234.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 306 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 235.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 307 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 236.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 308 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 237.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 309 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 238.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 310 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 239.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 311 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 240.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 312 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 241.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 313 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 242.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 314 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 243.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 315 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 244.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 316 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 245.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 317 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 246.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 318 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 247.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 319 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 248.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 320 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 249.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 321 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 250.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 322 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 251.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 323 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 252.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 324 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 253.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 325 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 254.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 326 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 255.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 327 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 256.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 328 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 257.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 329 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 258.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 330 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 259.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 331 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 260.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 332 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 261.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 333 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 262.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 334 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 263.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 335 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 264.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 336 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 265.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 337 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 265, be amended by deleting lines 18 to 22 on page 258.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 338 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 265, be amended by deleting lines 23 to 28 on page 258.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 339 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 266.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 340 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 266, be amended by adding after line 6 on page 260 the following:
“(9) For greater certainty, any prescribed information given to the Agency in relation to any persons on board or expected to be on board a conveyance shall be subject to the Privacy Act.”
Motion No. 341 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 266, be amended by adding after line 6 on page 260 the following:
“12.2 Within six months after the day on which regulations made under subsection 12.1(8) come into force, the impact of section 12.1 and those regulations on privacy rights must be assessed and reported to each House of Parliament.”
Motion No. 342 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 267.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 343 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 268.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 344 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 269.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 345 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 270.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 346 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 271.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 347 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 272.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 348 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 273.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 349 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 274.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 350 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 274, be amended by adding after line 38 on page 262 the following:
“(3) The council shall, within four months after the end of each year, submit to the Minister a report on the activities of the council during that year.
(4) The Minister shall cause a copy of the report to be laid before each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days after the day on which the Minister receives it.
(5) The Minister shall send a copy of the report to the lieutenant governor of each province immediately after a copy of the report is last laid before either House.
(6) For the purpose of this section, “sitting day” means a day on which either House of Parliament sits.”
Motion No. 351 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 275.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 352 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 276.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 353 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 276, be amended by replacing line 10 on page 263 with the following:
“province that the council considers appro-”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 354 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 276, be amended by replacing line 16 on page 263 with the following:
“in that province that the council considers”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 355 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 276, be amended by replacing lines 32 to 35 on page 263 with the following:
“(3.1) No person shall be included on a list referred to in subparagraph (3)(a)(i) or (ii) without the approval of the Minister.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 356 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 277.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 357 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 278.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 358 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 279.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 359 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 279, be amended
(a) by replacing line 3 on page 265 with the following:
“47. (1) The Minister may, following public consultation, designate any”
(b) by replacing lines 8 to 15 on page 265 with the following:
“specified in this Act, exercise the powers and perform the”
Motion No. 360 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 280.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 361 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 281.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 362 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 281, be amended by adding after line 39 on page 265 the following:
“51. (1) The Minister shall prepare an annual report on the hazardous materials information review activities during that year and, within four months after the termination of each year, shall cause a copy of the report to be laid before each House of Parliament.
(2) The Minister shall send a copy of the report to the lieutenant governor of each province forthwith after a copy of the report is laid before a House of Parliament under subsection (1).”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 363 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 282.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 364 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 283.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 365 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 284.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 366 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 285.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 367 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 286.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 368 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 287.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 369 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 288.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 370 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 289.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 371 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 290.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 372 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 291.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 373 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 292.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 374 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 293.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 375 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 294.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 376 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 295.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 377 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 296.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 378 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 297.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 379 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 298.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 380 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 307.
Motion No. 381 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 307, be amended
(a) by replacing line 5 on page 272 with the following:
“or less
(a) for 2011, the Minister shall refund the”
(b) by replacing line 15 on page 272 with the following:
“(b) for 2012, the Minister shall refund to the employer a portion of the premium for 2013 determined by the following formula if that amount is more than $2:
P2 – P1
where
P1 is the amount of the employer’s premium in 2012; and
P2 is the amount of the employer’s premium in 2013; and
(c) for 2013, the Minister shall refund to the employer a portion of the premium for 2014 determined by the following formula if that amount is more than $2:
P2 – P1
where
P1 is the amount of the employer’s premium in 2013; and
P2 is the amount of the employer’s premium in 2014.
(8.92) For the purposes of paragraph (8.91)(a),”
Motion No. 382 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 307, be amended by replacing line 19 on page 272 with the following:
“not exceed $2,000.”
Motion No. 383 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 308.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 384 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 308, be amended by adding after line 5 on page 273 the following:
“(1.02) The requirements established in accordance with subsection (1.01), including any regulations made under subsection 14(3), only apply for a period of 12 months from the date on which subsection (1.01) comes into force and, within a further period of six months, the impact and effectiveness of the electronic travel authorization must be assessed and the assessment reported to each House of Parliament.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 385 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 308, be amended by adding after line 5 on page 273 the following:
“(1.02) The Minister shall cause a copy of each proposed regulation made under subsection (1.01) to be laid before each House of Parliament, and each House shall refer the proposed regulation to the appropriate committee of that House.
(1.03) A regulation may not be made before the earliest of
(a) 30 sitting days after the proposed regulation is laid before Parliament,
(b) 160 calendar days after the proposed regulation is laid before Parliament, and
(c) the day after the day on which each appropriate committee has reported its findings with respect to the proposed regulation.
(1.04) The Minister shall take into account any report of the committee of either House. If a regulation does not incorporate a recommendation of the committee of either House, the Minister shall lay before that House a statement of the reasons for not incorporating it.
(1.05) A proposed regulation that has been laid before Parliament need not again be so laid prior to the making of the regulation, whether it has been altered or not.”
Motion No. 386 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 308, be amended by replacing line 5 on page 273 with the following:
“system or officer, and any personal information relating to the authorization may only be disclosed in accordance with the Privacy Act.”
Motion No. 387 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 309.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 388 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 309, be amended by adding after line 12 on page 273 the following:
“(4) Within six months after the day on which the regulations relating to electronic travel authorizations referred to in subsection 11(1.01) come into force, the impact of such authorizations on privacy rights must be assessed and the assessment reported to each House of Parliament.”
Motion No. 389 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 310.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 390 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 311.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 391 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 311, be amended by replacing line 24 on page 273 with the following:
“subsections 11(1) and (1.01), other than those for which an authorization is issued by the system and those”
Motion No. 392 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 312.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 393 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 312, be amended by adding after line 39 on page 273 the following:
“(3) Within 12 months after the coming into force of subsection (2), a review shall be conducted of the fees for the provision of services described in that subsection and of the merit of applying the User Fees Act to those fees, and the review shall be compiled into a report to be tabled in each House of Parliament.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 394 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 313.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 395 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 313, be amended by deleting lines 15 to 24 on page 274.
Motion No. 396 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 313, be amended by adding after line 24 on page 274 the following:
“(4) Within 12 months after the coming into force of subsection (3), a review shall be conducted of the fees for the provision of services described in that subsection and of the merit of applying the User Fees Act to those fees, and the review shall be compiled into a report to be tabled in each House of Parliament.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 397 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 314.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 398 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45 be amended by adding after line 19 on page 275 the following new clause:
“314.1 Section 308 comes into force one year after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 399 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 315.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 400 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 316.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 401 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 317.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 402 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 317, be amended by adding after line 22 on page 277 the following:
“(7) Section 2 of the Act is renumbered as subsection 2(1) and is amended by adding the following:
(2) When considering if a decision is in the public interest, the Minister shall consider if it would protect the public right of navigation, including the exercise of that right, and be consistent with the purpose of this Act.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 403 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 317, be amended by adding after line 22 on page 277 the following:
“(7) Section 2 of the Act is renumbered as subsection 2(1) and is amended by adding the following:
(2) For the purposes of this Act, when considering if a decision is in the public interest, the Minister shall consider whether it would protect the public right of navigation, including the exercise of that right.”
Motion No. 404 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45 be amended by adding after line 22 on page 277 the following new clause:
“317.1 The Act is amended by adding the following after section 2.1:
PURPOSE
2.2 The purpose of this Act is
(a) to recognize that the federal government has a role as trustee of public resources; and
(b) to protect navigation by protecting all navigable waters in Canada and the water levels and water flow necessary for navigation.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 405 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 318.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 406 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by adding after line 25 on page 277 the following:
“SPECIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
2.2 (1) There is established a committee to be known as the Special Advisory Committee consisting of the following representatives:
(a) two employees of the Department of Transport designated by the Minister, one of whom is assigned to the Navigable Waters Protection Program;
(b) one employee of the Department of the Environment designated by the Minister of the Environment;
(c) one employee of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans designated by the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans; and
(d) one representative of the Canadian Marine Advisory Council designated by that council.
(2) The committee shall exercise all the powers and perform all the duties and functions of the Minister under this Act, except those referred to in section 27 and in subsections 28(2) and 29(3).”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 407 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by adding after line 15 on page 278 the following:
“(4) The Minister shall provide the owner with written reasons for any decision made in response to a request under subsection (1) and shall make those reasons publicly accessible.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 408 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by adding after line 7 on page 279 the following:
“(f) the importance of that navigable water to Aboriginal people for traditional and other uses. ”
Motion No. 409 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing lines 16 to 23 on page 279 with the following:
“(b) the deposit of all plans in the local land registry or land titles office or any other place specified by the Minister and the provision of notice of the proposed work and of the deposit of the plans by advertising in the Canada Gazette and in one or more newspapers that are published in or near the place where the work is to be constructed.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 410 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 32 on page 279 with the following:
“the owner. The Minister shall provide to the owner and make publicly accessible written reasons for any determination made in relation to the proposal, including a decision to issue or refuse to issue an approval under section 6.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 411 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 30 on page 280 with the following:
“Minister and made publicly accessible 30 days before the transfer takes place.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 412 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended
(a) by replacing line 29 on page 277 with the following:
“navigable water”
(b) by deleting line 32 on page 277 to line 15 on page 278.
(c) by replacing line 20 on page 278 with the following:
“navigable water”
(d) by replacing line 42 on page 279 with the following:
“navigable water that”
(e) by replacing line 29 on page 281 with the following:
“any navigable water”
(f) by replacing line 4 on page 282 with the following:
“navigable water that”
(g) by replacing lines 34 and 35 on page 282 with the following:
“or across any navigable water only if the construction, placement, ”
(h) by replacing line 35 on page 283 with the following:
“shall immediately”
(i) by replacing lines 6 and 7 on page 284 with the following:
“through or across any navigable water to repair, alter or remove it”
(j) by replacing line 33 on page 284 with the following:
“water — shall”
(k) by replacing line 15 on page 285 with the following:
“— to secure,”
(l) by replacing line 37 on page 285 with the following:
“minor water — or”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 413 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 29 on page 277 with the following:
“navigable water”
Motion No. 414 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by deleting line 32 on page 277 to line 15 on page 278.
Motion No. 415 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 20 on page 278 with the following:
“navigable water”
Motion No. 416 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 42 on page 279 with the following:
“navigable water that”
Motion No. 417 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 29 on page 281 with the following:
“any navigable water”
Motion No. 418 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 4 on page 282 with the following:
“navigable water that”
Motion No. 419 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing lines 34 and 35 on page 282 with the following:
“or across any navigable water only if the construction, placement,”
Motion No. 420 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 35 on page 283 with the following:
“shall immediately”
Motion No. 421 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing lines 6 and 7 on page 284 with the following:
“through or across any navigable water to repair, alter or remove it”
Motion No. 422 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 33 on page 284 with the following:
“water — shall”
Motion No. 423 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 15 on page 285 with the following:
“— to secure,”
Motion No. 424 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 37 on page 285 with the following:
“minor water — or”
Motion No. 425 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 319.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 426 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 319, be amended by replacing lines 30 and 31 on page 286 with the following:
“than in any minor water — so that, in the Minister's opinion, it”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 427 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 320.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 428 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 320, be amended by replacing lines 11 to 13 on page 287 with the following:
“abandoned in any navigable water, other than in any minor water, the Minister may, under the restric-”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 429 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 321.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 430 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by deleting lines 23 to 30 on page 288.
Motion No. 431 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by replacing lines 15 to 17 on page 289 with the following:
“through or across any navigable waters, other than any minor waters;”
Motion No. 432 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by replacing line 9 on page 290 with the following:
“(a) designating any works, other than bridges, booms, dams and causeways, as minor works;”
Motion No. 433 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by adding after line 24 on page 290 the following:
“(2.1) Before making any order under paragraph (2)(a), the Minister shall assess the likely environmental effects of those works.
(2.2) Before making any order under paragraph (2)(b), the Minister shall take into account
(a) the ecological value of that navigable water;
(b) the utility of that navigable water for the purposes of fishing and hunting; and
(c) the importance of that navigable water to Aboriginal people for traditional and other uses.
(2.3) The Minister shall post a summary of the assessments made under subsections (2.1) and (2.2) on the Internet site of the Department of Transport.”
Motion No. 434 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by replacing lines 31 to 36 on page 290 with the following:
“28.1 (1) The Minister must table, in each House of Parliament, every order that he or she proposes to make under paragraphs 28(2)(a) and (b).
(2) Each proposed order that is tabled before a House must, on the day it is tabled, be referred by that House to an appropriate committee of that House, as determined by the rules of that House, and the committee may conduct inquiries or public hearings with respect to the proposed order and report its findings to that House.
(3) A proposed order that has been tabled pursuant to subsection (1) may be made
(a) on the expiration of 30 sitting days after it was last tabled in either House; or
(b) if, with respect to each House,
(i) the committee reports to the House, or
(ii) the committee decides not to conduct inquiries or public hearings.
(4) For the purpose of this section, “sitting day” means a day on which either House sits.”
Motion No. 435 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by adding after line 13 on page 291 the following:
“(d) is required for the protection of fish habitat; or
(e) is required for the protection of the environment.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 436 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by adding after line 13 on page 291 the following:
“(2.1) The Governor in Council shall, by regulation, add to the schedule, in relation to a request that is accepted under section 4, any water in, on, over, under, through or across which the work is constructed or placed, or proposed to be constructed or placed.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 437 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by adding after line 21 on page 291 the following:
“(5) Following any amendment to the schedule, the Minister must publish in the Canada Gazette all scientific and administrative research and studies that he or she considered before recommending the amendment.
(6) The requirement referred to in subsection (5) also applies to the schedule as it reads on the day on which this section comes into force.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 438 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by deleting lines 22 to 43 on page 291.
Motion No. 439 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by replacing lines 17 to 19 on page 290 with the following:
“through or across any navigable waters, other than minor waters; and”
Motion No. 440 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by deleting lines 1 to 21 on page 291.
Motion No. 441 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 322.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 442 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 323.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 443 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 324.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 444 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 325.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 445 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 326.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 446 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 327.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 447 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 328.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 448 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 328, be amended by adding after line 12 on page 294 the following:
“RIGHT OF ACTION
39.01 An individual may bring an action for damages in public nuisance in respect of any navigable waters, including those listed in the schedule, without the consent of the Attorney General and without establishing special damages if
(a) the individual has suffered or will likely suffer damages as a result of the public nuisance; and
(b) the public nuisance has interfered or will likely interfere with the individual's own right of navigation.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 449 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 328, be amended by adding after line 12 on page 294 the following:
“RIGHT OF ACTION
39.01 An individual whose right of navigation in respect of any navigable waters has been interfered with, or will likely be interfered with, may bring a claim for relief in public nuisance without the consent of the Attorney General and without establishing special damages.”
Motion No. 450 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 329.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 451 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 330.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 452 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 331.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 453 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 332.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 454 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 332, be amended by deleting lines 19 to 33 on page 301.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 455 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 332, be amended by deleting lines 19 to 33 on page 301.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 456 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 333.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 457 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 334.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 458 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 335.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 459 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 336.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 460 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 337.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 461 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 338.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 462 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 339.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 463 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 340.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 464 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 341.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 465 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 342.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 466 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 343.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 467 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 344.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 468 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 345.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 469 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 346.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 470 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 347.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 471 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 348.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 472 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 349.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 473 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 350.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 474 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 351.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 475 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 352.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 476 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 353.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 477 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 354.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 478 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 355.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 479 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 356.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 480 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 357.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 481 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 358.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 482 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 358, be amended by replacing line 8 on page 309 with the following:
“reinspection of the grain, to the grain appeal tribunal for the Division or the chief grain”
Motion No. 483 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 358, be amended by replacing line 12 on page 309 with the following:
“within 30 days after the decision that is the”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 484 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 358, be amended by replacing line 14 on page 309 with the following:
“appeal is given to the grain appeal tribunal for the Division or the chief grain inspector for”
Motion No. 485 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 359.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 486 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 359, be amended by replacing line 18 on page 309 with the following:
“41. (1) If an appeal is taken, the grain appeal tribunal for the Division or the chief grain”
Motion No. 487 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 359, be amended by replacing line 32 on page 309 with the following:
“(2) The decision of the grain appeal tribunal for the Division or the chief grain inspector”
Motion No. 488 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 359, be amended by replacing line 37 on page 309 with the following:
“conferred on him or her under subsection (1) provided that it is demonstrated that the delegate has no direct or indirect interest, financial or otherwise, in the outcome of the appeal.”
Motion No. 489 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 360.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 490 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 361.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 491 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 362.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 492 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 362, be amended by replacing line 16 on page 310 with the following:
“provide a security, in the form of a bond, for the purpose of”
Motion No. 493 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 363.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 494 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 363, be amended by replacing line 33 on page 310 with the following:
“provided a security as required by subsection”
Motion No. 495 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 363, be amended by replacing line 40 on page 310 with the following:
“provided a security as required by subsection”
Motion No. 496 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 364.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 497 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 364, be amended by replacing line 2 on page 311 with the following:
“believe that any security provided by a licensee”
Motion No. 498 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 364, be amended by replacing line 13 on page 311 with the following:
“provided by a licensee, and the security may be”
Motion No. 499 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 365.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 500 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 366.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 501 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 367.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 502 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 368.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 503 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 369.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 25, 2012
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 504 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended by replacing lines 37 and 38 on page 313 with the following:
“terminal elevator shall submit grain received into the elevator for an official weighing, in a manner authorized by the”
Motion No. 505 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended by replacing line 1 on page 314 with the following:
“authorized by the Commission who has been demonstrated to have no direct or indirect interest, financial or otherwise, in the grain and chosen”
Motion No. 506 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended by replacing line 26 on page 314 with the following:
“authorized by the Commission who has been demonstrated to have no direct or indirect interest, financial or otherwise, in the grain and chosen by”
Motion No. 507 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended by replacing line 24 on page 315 with the following:
“section provided that it is demonstrated that the delegate has no direct or indirect interest, financial or otherwise, in the decision.”
Motion No. 508 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended by replacing line 28 on page 316 with the following:
“Commission and chosen by the operator. A third party may not be authorized unless it is demonstrated that it has no direct or indirect interest, financial or otherwise, in the outcome of the weighing or inspection.”
Motion No. 509 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended
(a) by replacing line 40 on page 314 with the following:
“the grain appeal tribunal for the Division or the chief grain inspector for Canada for a”
(b) by replacing line 44 on page 314 with the following:
“prescribed portion of them, to the grain appeal tribunal for the Division or the chief grain”
Motion No. 510 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended
(a) by replacing lines 19 and 20 on page 316 with the following:
“70.2 (1) An operator of a licensed”
(b) by replacing lines 23 and 24 on page 316 with the following:
“third party or cause it to be officially”
Motion No. 511 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 370.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 512 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 371.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 513 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 372.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 514 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 373.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 515 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 374.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 516 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 375.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 517 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 376.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 518 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 377.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 519 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 378.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 520 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 379.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 521 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 380.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 522 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 381.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 523 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 382.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 524 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 383.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 525 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 384.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 526 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 385.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 527 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 386.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 528 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 387.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 529 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 388.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 530 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 389.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 531 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 390.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 532 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 391.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 533 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 392.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 534 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 393.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 535 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 394.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 536 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 395.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 537 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 396.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 538 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 397.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 539 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 398.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 540 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 399.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 541 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 400.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 542 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 401.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 543 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 402.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 544 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 403.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 545 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 404.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 546 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 405.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 547 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 406.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 548 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 407.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 549 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 408.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 550 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 409.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 551 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 410.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 552 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 411.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 553 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 412.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 554 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 413.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 555 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 425.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) and Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 556 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 426.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) and Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 557 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 427.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) and Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 558 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 428.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) and Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 559 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 429.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) and Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 560 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 430.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) and Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 561 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 431.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) and Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 562 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 432.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) and Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 563 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 432, be amended by deleting lines 43 and 44 on page 335.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 564 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 433.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 565 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 434.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 566 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 435.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) and Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 567 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 436.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 568 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 437.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 569 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 437, be amended by deleting lines 25 to 34 on page 341.
Motion No. 570 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 438.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 571 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 438, be amended by replacing lines 25 to 27 on page 342 with the following:
“(3) After receiving the report referred to in section 66.3 and its summary, the Minister shall cause them to be laid before each House of”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 572 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 438, be amended by adding after line 29 on page 342 the following:
“(4) The report and summary laid before Parliament stand permanently referred to any parliamentary committee that may be designated or established to review matters relating to employment insurance.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 573 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 439.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 574 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 440.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 575 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 441.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 576 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 442.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 577 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 443.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 578 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 444.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 579 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 445.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) and Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 580 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 445, be amended by adding after line 15 on page 348 the following:
“(2) After receiving a report submitted under subsection (1), the Minister shall cause it to be laid before each House of Parliament on any of the next 15 days during which that House is sitting.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 581 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 446.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) and Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 582 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 447.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) and Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 583 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 448.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 584 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 449.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 585 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 450.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 586 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 451.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 587 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 452.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 588 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 453.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 589 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 454.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 590 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 455.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 591 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 456.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 592 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 457.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 593 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 458.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 594 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 459.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 595 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 460.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 596 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 460, be amended by replacing lines 43 and 44 on page 350 with the following:
“General of Canada, who must submit a report of the audit to the Minister.
(2) After receiving the report referred to in subsection (1), the Minister shall cause it to be laid before each House of Parliament on any of the next 15 days during which that House is sitting.”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 597 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 461.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 598 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 462.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 599 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 463.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 600 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 464.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 601 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 465.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 602 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 466.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 603 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 467.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 604 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 468.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 605 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 469.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 606 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 470.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 607 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 471.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 608 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 472.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 609 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 473.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 610 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 474.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 611 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 475.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 612 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 476.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 613 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 477.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 614 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 478.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 615 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 479.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 616 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 480.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 617 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 481.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 618 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 482.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 619 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 483.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 620 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 484.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 621 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 485.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 622 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 486.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 623 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 487.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 624 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 488.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 625 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 489.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 626 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 490.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 627 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 491.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 628 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 492.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 629 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 493.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 630 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 494.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 631 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 495.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 632 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 496.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 633 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 497.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 634 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 498.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 635 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 499.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 636 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 500.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 637 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 501.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 638 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 502.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 639 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 503.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 640 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 504.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 641 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 505.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 642 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 506.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 643 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 507.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 644 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 508.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 645 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 509.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 646 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 510.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 647 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 511.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 648 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 512.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 649 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 513.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 650 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 514.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 651 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 515.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 652 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 516.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 653 — November 26, 2012 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 516, be amended by replacing lines 30 and 31 on page 389 with the following:
“Agency must consult with the President of the Treasury”
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 654 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Schedule 1.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) and Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie) — November 26, 2012
Motion No. 655 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Schedule 2.