House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
|
|
|
Order PaperNo. 59 Tuesday, March 4, 2008 10:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
|
Order of Business |
Daily Routine of Business — at 10:00 a.m. |
Tabling of Documents |
|
Introduction of Government Bills |
|
| No. 1 |
| December 7, 2007 — The Minister of Industry — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Copyright Act”. |
Statements by Ministers |
|
Presenting Reports from Interparliamentary Delegations |
|
Presenting Reports from Committees |
|
Introduction of Private Members' Bills |
|
| No. 1 |
| October 16, 2007 — Mr. Allison (Niagara West—Glanbrook) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Excise Act, 2001 (wine exemption)”. |
| No. 2 |
| October 16, 2007 — Mr. Guimond (Montmorency—Charlevoix—Haute-Côte-Nord) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act (appointment of returning officers)”. |
| No. 3 |
| October 16, 2007 — Ms. Wasylycia-Leis (Winnipeg North) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Bank Act (branch closures)”. |
| No. 4 |
| October 16, 2007 — Mr. Mark (Dauphin—Swan River—Marquette) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Holidays Act (National Heritage Day) and to make consequential amendments to other Acts”. |
| No. 5 |
| October 16, 2007 — Mr. Mark (Dauphin—Swan River—Marquette) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Access to Information Act (disclosure of results of public opinion polls)”. |
| No. 6 |
| October 16, 2007 — Mr. Mark (Dauphin—Swan River—Marquette) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (deduction for gifts)”. |
| No. 7 |
| October 16, 2007 — Mr. Mark (Dauphin—Swan River—Marquette) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (increase of benefits)”. |
| No. 8 |
| October 16, 2007 — Mr. Mark (Dauphin—Swan River—Marquette) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the National Defence Act (Snowbirds)”. |
| No. 9 |
| October 16, 2007 — Mr. Silva (Davenport) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Parliament of Canada Act (oath or solemn affirmation)”. |
| No. 10 |
| October 16, 2007 — Mr. Silva (Davenport) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canadian Peacekeeping Service Medal Act (Book of Remembrance for peacekeepers)”. |
| No. 11 |
| October 16, 2007 — Mr. Hill (Prince George—Peace River) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Divorce Act (shared parenting)”. |
| No. 12 |
| October 16, 2007 — Mr. Sorenson (Crowfoot) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and the Prisons and Reformatories Act (conditional release)”. |
| No. 13 |
| October 16, 2007 — Mrs. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation Act (profits distributed to provinces)”. |
| No. 14 |
| October 16, 2007 — Mr. Paquette (Joliette) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada-Israel Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (goods originating from settlements)”. |
| No. 15 |
| October 16, 2007 — Ms. Guay (Rivière-du-Nord) — Bill entitled “An Act respecting the use of government contracts to promote economic development”. |
| No. 16 |
| October 16, 2007 — Mrs. Lavallée (Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code (pregnant or nursing employees)”. |
| No. 17 |
| October 16, 2007 — Ms. St-Hilaire (Longueuil—Pierre-Boucher) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Excise Tax Act (children's diapers and products for newborns)”. |
| No. 18 |
| October 16, 2007 — Mr. Allison (Niagara West—Glanbrook) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (duty to report abuse of seniors)”. |
| No. 19 |
| October 16, 2007 — Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Pension Benefits Standards Act, 1985 (protection of the assets)”. |
| No. 20 |
| October 16, 2007 — Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Competition Act (investigations by Commissioner and class proceedings) and to make a related amendment to another Act”. |
| No. 21 |
| October 16, 2007 — Mr. Harris (Cariboo—Prince George) — Bill entitled “An Act to change the name of the electoral district of Cariboo — Prince George”. |
| No. 22 |
| October 16, 2007 — Mr. Cannis (Scarborough Centre) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (wilful destruction or desecration to national flag, national symbols, national monuments and statues)”. |
| No. 23 |
| October 16, 2007 — Mr. McTeague (Pickering—Scarborough East) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (hate propaganda)”. |
| No. 24 |
| October 16, 2007 — Mr. Goodyear (Cambridge) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (sex offender registry)”. |
| No. 25 |
| October 16, 2007 — Mr. Goodyear (Cambridge) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (registration of sex offenders)”. |
| No. 26 |
| October 16, 2007 — Mr. Telegdi (Kitchener—Waterloo) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Citizenship Act (revocation of citizenship)”. |
| No. 27 |
| October 16, 2007 — Mr. Tilson (Dufferin—Caledon) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Citizenship Act (citizenship of persons born outside Canada)”. |
| No. 28 |
| October 16, 2007 — Mr. Casey (Cumberland—Colchester—Musquodoboit Valley) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the War Veterans Allowance Act (allied veterans)”. |
| No. 29 |
| October 17, 2007 — Mr. Lunney (Nanaimo—Alberni) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Excise Tax Act (naturopathic services)”. |
| No. 30 |
| October 22, 2007 — Mrs. Smith (Kildonan—St. Paul) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (protection of children from sexual exploitation)”. |
| No. 31 |
| October 30, 2007 — Ms. McDonough (Halifax) — Bill entitled “An Act to ensure accountability in respect of Canada's obligations under international treaties”. |
| No. 32 |
| January 24, 2008 — Mr. McTeague (Pickering—Scarborough East) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (indecent acts and exposure)”. |
| No. 33 |
| January 28, 2008 — Mr. Vellacott (Saskatoon—Wanuskewin) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (protection of conscience rights in the health care profession)”. |
| No. 34 |
| January 29, 2008 — Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (judicial discretion)”. |
| No. 35 |
| February 8, 2008 — Mr. Atamanenko (British Columbia Southern Interior) — Bill entitled “An Act to bring the Food and Drug Regulations in line with the Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality”. |
| No. 36 |
| February 13, 2008 — Mr. St-Cyr (Jeanne-Le Ber) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada Transportation Act (vibration and noise)”. |
| No. 37 |
| February 13, 2008 — Mr. Scott (Fredericton) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Heritage Railway Stations Protection Act”. |
| No. 38 |
| February 25, 2008 — Ms. Wasylycia-Leis (Winnipeg North) — Bill entitled “An Act to establish a National Organ Donor Registry and to coordinate and promote organ donation throughout Canada”. |
| No. 39 |
| February 25, 2008 — Ms. Wasylycia-Leis (Winnipeg North) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act (prevention of private hospitals)”. |
| No. 40 |
| February 25, 2008 — Mr. Lemay (Abitibi—Témiscamingue) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (Employment Insurance Account)”. |
| No. 41 |
| February 27, 2008 — Mr. Bagnell (Yukon) — Bill entitled “An Act to establish a National Fish and Wildlife Heritage Commission and to re-establish the Survey on the Importance of Nature to Canadians”. |
| No. 42 |
| February 28, 2008 — Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act (appointment of permanent members)”. |
| No. 43 |
| February 28, 2008 — Mr. Alghabra (Mississauga—Erindale) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (certificate and special advocate) and to make consequential amendments to other Acts”. |
First Reading of Senate Public Bills |
|
Motions |
|
| No. 1 |
| November 21, 2007 — Mr. Wrzesnewskyj (Etobicoke Centre) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, November 21, 2007, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 2 |
| November 23, 2007 — Mr. Poilievre (Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Treasury Board) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, November 21, 2007, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 3 |
| November 23, 2007 — Mr. Sweet (Ancaster—Dundas—Flamborough—Westdale) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, November 21, 2007, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 4 |
| November 27, 2007 — Mr. Laforest (Saint-Maurice—Champlain) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, November 21, 2007, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 5 |
| December 6, 2007 — Mr. Anders (Calgary West) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Thursday, December 6, 2007, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Friday, April 4, 2008, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 6 |
| December 6, 2007 — Ms. Chow (Trinity—Spadina) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Thursday, December 6, 2007, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Friday, April 4, 2008, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 7 |
| December 6, 2007 — Mr. Lussier (Brossard—La Prairie) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, presented on Wednesday, December 5, 2007, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 8 |
| December 7, 2007 — Ms. Fry (Vancouver Centre) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, presented on Friday, December 7, 2007, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 9 |
| December 10, 2007 — Mr. Telegdi (Kitchener—Waterloo) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Thursday, December 6, 2007, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Friday, April 4, 2008, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 10 |
| December 10, 2007 — Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, December 10, 2007, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Tuesday, April 8, 2008, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 11 |
| December 12, 2007 — Mr. Bezan (Selkirk—Interlake) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Thursday, April 10, 2008, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 12 |
| December 12, 2007 — Mrs. Skelton (Saskatoon—Rosetown—Biggar) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Thursday, April 10, 2008, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 13 |
| December 12, 2007 — Mr. Harvey (Louis-Hébert) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Official Languages, presented on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — cannot be moved (See Concurrence in Committee Reports No. 8). |
| No. 14 |
| December 12, 2007 — Mr. Cannan (Kelowna—Lake Country) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on International Trade, presented on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 15 |
| December 12, 2007 — Mr. Brown (Barrie) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Thursday, April 10, 2008, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 16 |
| December 12, 2007 — Mrs. Davidson (Sarnia—Lambton) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Thursday, April 10, 2008, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 17 |
| January 24, 2008 — Ms. Chow (Trinity—Spadina) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Thursday, December 13, 2007, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 18 |
| January 24, 2008 — Mr. Atamanenko (British Columbia Southern Interior) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Thursday, April 10, 2008, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 19 |
| January 28, 2008 — Mr. Lebel (Roberval—Lac-Saint-Jean) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Monday, January 28, 2008, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 20 |
| February 1, 2008 — Mr. Fast (Abbotsford) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, presented on Friday, February 1, 2008, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 21 |
| February 1, 2008 — Mr. Batters (Palliser) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, presented Friday, December 7, 2007, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 22 |
| February 1, 2008 — Mr. Fast (Abbotsford) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, presented Friday, December 7, 2007, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 23 |
| February 1, 2008 — Mr. Harvey (Louis-Hébert) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, presented on Wednesday, December 5, 2007, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 24 |
| February 1, 2008 — Mr. Watson (Essex) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, presented on Wednesday, December 5, 2007, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 25 |
| February 4, 2008 — Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Monday, January 28, 2008, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 26 |
| February 4, 2008 — Mrs. Lavallée (Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Monday, February 4, 2008, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 27 |
| February 6, 2008 — Mr. Lake (Edmonton—Mill Woods—Beaumont) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Wednesday, February 6, 2008, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 28 |
| February 6, 2008 — Mr. Petit (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Wednesday, February 6, 2008, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 29 |
| February 7, 2008 — Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Wednesday, February 6, 2008, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 30 |
| February 8, 2008 — Mr. Paquette (Joliette) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Official Languages, presented on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — cannot be moved (See Concurrence in Committee Reports No. 8). |
| No. 31 |
| February 8, 2008 — Mr. Nadeau (Gatineau) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Official Languages, presented on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — cannot be moved (See Concurrence in Committee Reports No. 8). |
| No. 32 |
| February 8, 2008 — Mr. Hubbard (Miramichi) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Monday, February 4, 2008, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 33 |
| February 11, 2008 — Mr. Easter (Malpeque) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Thursday, April 10, 2008, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 34 |
| February 13, 2008 — Mr. Wrzesnewskyj (Etobicoke Centre) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Tuesday, February 12, 2008, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 35 |
| February 13, 2008 — Ms. Neville (Winnipeg South Centre) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Status of Women, presented on Wednesday, February 13, 2008, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 36 |
| February 13, 2008 — Mrs. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Status of Women, presented on Wednesday, February 13, 2008, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 37 |
| February 13, 2008 — Mrs. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Status of Women, presented on Wednesday, February 13, 2008, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 38 |
| February 13, 2008 — Ms. Neville (Winnipeg South Centre) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Status of Women, presented on Wednesday, February 13, 2008, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 39 |
| February 13, 2008 — Mr. Lessard (Chambly—Borduas) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Wednesday, February 13, 2008, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 40 |
| February 14, 2008 — Ms. Savoie (Victoria) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Wednesday, February 13, 2008, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 41 |
| February 21, 2008 — Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, presented on Friday, February 15, 2008, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 42 |
| February 21, 2008 — Mr. Batters (Palliser) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, presented on Friday, February 15, 2008, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 43 |
| February 21, 2008 — Mr. Chong (Wellington—Halton Hills) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, presented on Friday, February 15, 2008, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 44 |
| February 25, 2008 — Mrs. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Status of Women, presented on Monday, February 25, 2008, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 45 |
| February 25, 2008 — Mrs. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Status of Women, presented on Monday, February 25, 2008, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 46 |
| February 26, 2008 — Ms. Neville (Winnipeg South Centre) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Status of Women, presented on Monday, February 25, 2008, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 47 |
| February 26, 2008 — Ms. Keeper (Churchill) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Status of Women, presented on Monday, February 25, 2008, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 48 |
| February 29, 2008 — Ms. Demers (Laval) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Status of Women, presented on Wednesday, February 13, 2008, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 49 |
| February 29, 2008 — Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Friday, February 29, 2008, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
Presenting Petitions |
|
Questions on the Order Paper |
|
|
The complete list of questions on the Order Paper is available for consultation at the Table in the Chamber and on the Internet. Those questions not appearing in the list have been answered, withdrawn or made into orders for return.
|
|
Government Orders |
Statements by Members — at 2:00 p.m. |
Oral Questions — not later than 2:15 p.m. until 3:00 p.m. |
Government Orders |
Private Members' Business — from 5:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. |