CONCLUSION

In reflecting upon the work we have done over the past months and the volumes of testimony we have heard, there is no doubt in our minds that the Canadian Forces are an institution with special needs and enormous challenges. There is no equivalent occupation in civil society. The unlimited liability which members assume once enlisted immediately sets them apart.

The fact that we were asked to undertake our study is clear indication that there exists a significant amount of good will to make positive change. Yet, we also recognize that good intentions without adequate resources upon which to build can only lead to further frustration and impotence. We have reached the bottom line. Can the Forces make do with less? No they cannot. If we are going to protect our national interests and participate in missions that promote the values of international peace and democracy - for which all Canadians stand - then our present commitment to the men and women of the Canadian Forces is barely adequate. Indeed, we would not be remiss in suggesting that it has ceased to be adequate. This is a reality with which not only we as Parliamentarians and legislators must come to terms, it is a fact that must be recognized by all Canadians.

Our Forces are there to serve, not simply to be used. When called upon they have taken to their tasks with enthusiasm, skill and a sense of professionalism. They are more than willing to serve, but they are tired of being used. True commitment is rarely one sided. If we are to ask our Forces to commit to the tasks we set for them in pursuit of our national interests, then they have every right to expect us to honour our side of the bargain. It is our responsibility - Parliamentarians and public alike - to ensure that our military personnel are well equipped, properly cared for and equitably compensated. We should do no less.

There is a price attached to unlimited liability - a strict code of discipline, individual and family sacrifice on behalf of the needs of the CF, the ever present danger of serious injury, and even death in the line of duty. There will also be a price attached to the recommendations we have set forth. When implemented we believe they will do much to see to the real needs of our military. When the costing is done, we firmly believe that payment must be made.

Throughout our report we have tried to be realistic and positive. We believe our recommendations attend to the concerns expressed during our hearings and hope that they will adequately meet the needs of CF members. We all came away with the firm conviction that our serving men and women make a vital contribution to Canadian society and for this we applaud them.

Finally, we want to ensure that our recommendations are implemented as quickly as possible and that the actual program, policy and administrative changes put in place properly reflect our intent. We consider this a matter of accountability. Our accountability as Members of Parliament to the service men and women of the Canadian Forces. And, the accountability of the Minister of National Defence - and through the Minister the senior leadership of the CF - to the Standing Committee on National Defence and Veterans Affairs. We therefore recommend:

88. That the Chief of the Defence Staff table with SCONDVA an interim report within one year and a comprehensive report within two years on the progress made with respect to quality of life issues in the Canadian Forces.

89. That SCONDVA be empowered, when it deems it appropriate, to visit selective bases to enquire into the effectiveness of reforms made with respect to quality of life issues in the Canadian Forces.