:
Good afternoon, Mr. Chair, distinguished members of the committee, and the partners who are here with us. On behalf of the board of directors of the Association des universités de la francophonie canadienne, and on my personal behalf, I thank you for your invitation. It will be a pleasure for me to share with you the AUFC's information, comments and recommendations on second official language immersion programs in Canada.
Though many of you already know the Association des universités de la francophonie canadienne, allow me to begin by giving you a short overview of the association and its contribution to the development of French-speaking Canada and of linguistic diversity. Then I will share some information about today's topic and the important role that the AUFC and its members play in this area. I will conclude with some recommendations.
The AUFC represents 14 French-speaking or bilingual universities of all sizes, located in seven provinces outside Quebec. The programs offered by those institutions enhance the quality and scope of university learning, teaching and research in French, thereby contributing to the development of French-speaking communities in Canada. The AUFC is therefore committed to playing a role in Canada's human, cultural and economic development through the quality and accessible university training it offers across the country.
With their primary function as intellectual nerve centres for post-secondary education in French outside Quebec, our universities also play a key role in the promotion of official languages in Canada. This dual role sets us apart from the francophone universities in Quebec and allows our students to enjoy a unique French-speaking experience in our communities.
The association's programming is funded in large part by Canadian Heritage and by the dues paid by our members. This year and last, the association was also able to count on funding from Canadian Heritage for some immersion projects. One such program was to provide 25 immersion scholarships, each of $5,000, to the best graduates from immersion high schools registered in one of the AUFC's member universities.
This year as well, the department is funding a project conducted in conjunction with l'Association canadienne des professeurs d'immersion. One of the things that this funding will allow us to do is to complete a study of the needs of immersion students enrolled in our member institutions. This will identify and suggest support and assistance services that could be put in place in order to provide a better welcome and orientation for immersion students arriving from high school.
I now move on to the subject that brings us together today, the study of immersion programs in Canada.
We estimate that around 5 million of Canada's 34 million inhabitants speak both official languages. Currently, around 340,000 students are enrolled in elementary and secondary immersion programs. Those students represent a critical mass to be recruited by and educated in our French-speaking or bilingual universities. The institutions that are members of the AUFC are addressing that recruitment already because more than 5,500 of their students come from immersion out of the 24,000 or so students enrolled in undergraduate programs offered in French or bilingually.
This critical mass of students is very important because it is becoming imperative to create a bilingual workforce at a time when Canada is playing a greater and greater role in the national and international economy. We are therefore very proud to be able to say that, each year, around 6,000 highly qualified, bilingual students receive degrees from our member universities.
The international forum on immersion at the university level that was held in February 2012 identified the challenges facing bilingual university teaching programs and the extra effort required by students enrolled in second language programs. To meet those challenges, universities must put in place orientation programs and special services in order to provide a cultural and social context that will allow the students to continue their immersion experience outside of their campus and during their internships.
I must also say that the move from a high school immersion program to a university immersion program creates a lot of insecurity for the students. They now find themselves in class with francophone students, whereas they were used to being with their anglophone peers in high school. So students may decide not to continue with French-language or immersion studies at university, very often because they are not sure about the quality and the breadth of programs offered in French-speaking universities outside Quebec.
In that context, Statistics Canada notes that bilingualism rates reach their peak with the 15 to 19-year-old age group, at the end of high school; the rate dwindles after that. In 2001, for example, 14.7% of young anglophones in that age group were bilingual. In 2006, just five years later, only 12.2% of the same age group, now aged 20 to 24, identified themselves as bilingual. The knowledge of French as a second language therefore seems to decline with time if it is not supported by a post-secondary experience. However, that experience is available all across the country.
That statistic underlines the importance of more promotion of post-secondary programs offered in French all across Canada, as well as of establishing the infrastructure required to encourage students to continue post-secondary studies in immersion or in French in order to allow their bilingualism to take root.
Here are our recommendations for improving the current situation of bilingualism and second official language learning programs.
First, we would like your committee to recommend in its report that the Government of Canada support the creation of a promotion, awareness and information campaign to inform Canadians, including new Canadians, about the existence of a continuum of French-language education, from elementary to post-secondary. As a result, Canadians would be able to choose a French immersion school, or first-language French school, safe in the knowledge that they would be able to continue their studies in the language up to post-secondary level.
Second, in order to improve existing second official language learning programs, we feel that it is essential to increase collaboration and partnerships between provincial, territorial and federal government authorities on the one hand and, on the other, national organizations that are concerned about bilingualism and that have a scope and a presence in communities across the country. We are thinking here about the AUFC, Canadian Parents for French, the Canadian Association of Second Language Teachers, and so on. With the help of the federal government, the AUFC is offering to work together with the Council of Ministers of Education, Canada to strengthen the ties between the various stakeholders.
Finally, we hope that the new Protocol for Agreements for Minority-Language Education and Second-Language Instruction will lead to an improvement in federal government support for second-language teaching at post-secondary level in Canada. In this context, we would like your committee to recommend that the federal government increase funding for strengthening the capacity and infrastructures of small francophone universities outside Quebec. The result would be improved access to their immersion programs, which would also be better maintained and developed.
Once again, I thank you for inviting me today. I will be pleased to answer your questions.
Good afternoon. On behalf of our director Tony Pontes, and the chair of our board Janet McDougald, we are pleased to accept your invitation to appear before the House Standing Committee on Official Languages.
In the Peel District School Board, we have three very successful French as a second language programs. We have French immersion, abbreviated as FI, which begins in grade 1. We have extended French beginning in grade 7, and core French beginning in grade 4.
As the invitation we received asked us to address French immersion “access, capacity, waiting lists, best practices, and efficiencies”, we will confine our remarks to those aspects of our FI program.
The demand for an FI program has grown at a very rapid pace in our board over the last 10 years. In 2001, 9.4% of all grade 1 students were in FI. By 2011, this percentage increased to approximately 25%. This growth demonstrates our board's commitment to the belief that FI is an option for all students, and the principle that “Participation in FSL programs should reflect the diversity of the student population, including students with special education needs and English language learners.” That's from the ministry document entitled “A Framework for French as a Second Language in Ontario Schools, Kindergarten to Grade 12”, on page 10.
However, the rapid growth of the FI program has caused some stakeholders to express concern about the board's ability to sustain a quality FI program for students. To address this concern about the sustainability of a quality FI program, the Peel District School Board conducted an extensive review in 2011-12 of its elementary FI program.
This review was conducted by a committee and had several components, including an extensive review of the literature. Also, FI parent input was sought through a survey, to which 4,342 families responded. They were asked the following questions: Why did you enrol your child in French immersion? If busing were not provided for French immersion, would you have registered your child in the program? For those parents where French immersion is offered at your home school, would you have registered your child in the program if it had been offered at another school? The survey also asked whether they were planning on having their child continue French immersion in secondary school, and finally we asked if there were any other comments that they would like to share.
Other stakeholders, such as board departments, were asked to provide information as issues emerged. For example, our board is experiencing tremendous enrolment pressures in some areas, and this pressure has impacted space for potential FI programs.
The key finding that emerged from the review was the difficulty in ensuring a quality FI teacher. The review committee defined quality as a teacher who is qualified, fluent, and committed. The review committee found that although principals were finding it very difficult to hire teachers who are qualified to teach French immersion, qualifications alone were not enough to ensure a quality program.
The review committee heard repeatedly from different stakeholders regarding instances where a teacher had the requisite paper qualifications but was not fluent in French. Furthermore, the review committee heard that qualified and fluent teachers sometimes chose to leave the French immersion program to teach in the English program. The review committee heard that although it is very difficult for principals to find French immersion teachers for permanent contract teaching assignments, it is even more problematic for them to find FI teachers for long-term occasional assignments.
Although the Ontario College of Teachers has stated that there is not a shortage of FI teachers, this has not been our experience in Peel.
Early in the 2012-13 school year, the review committee shared its findings and recommendations with the board of trustees. The board of trustees considered the report and recommendations and enacted some changes to the French immersion program. These changes will be revisited by 2017.
First, the grade 1 French immersion program will be capped at the September 2012 level of enrolment, which is roughly 25%. Second, if registrations for FI exceed capacity at a school, then a lottery process would be used. Third, some students would be exempt from a lottery process should it occur.
At this time we would like to share our process for accessing grade 1 French immersion. First, and most importantly, information is provided to parents so that they can make an informed decision about their children's participation in French immersion. Information evenings are held in every French immersion school and at central locations. The board provides informational material in a variety of formats and languages. The board has worked in partnership with Canadian Parents for French to produce two informational videos for parents.
The second major aspect of our process for accessing grade 1 French immersion is that the registration deadline is set well in advance, and this deadline is communicated to parents in a variety of formats and languages.
The next step is that if there are more registered students than there are people spaces at the school, then a lottery is conducted. However, for the 2013-14 school year, only 4 of our 34 grade 1 french immersion schools used a lottery. Therefore, 97.5% of registrants were placed without a lottery.
Lastly, we keep students on wait lists. We continue to monitor them until the end of their first week of school in September. At this time, students on the wait list who cannot be accommodated at their home French immersion school are offered a place in the nearest French immersion school that has space. By the end of our registration process, all families who registered for grade 1 French immersion were offered a place in French immersion either in their home French immersion school or the nearest French immersion school that had space.
We feel that our registration process has been a success. We have ensured a quality program, but we've also been able to offer a place for all who registered for grade 1 French immersion. We are proud of our French immersion program, our students and our staff, and we value all forms of diversity, including linguistic diversity, and we are pleased to provide students with an opportunity to learn, for many, their third language.
Thank you, Chair.
Thank you, witnesses, for being here.
To the members from Peel District School Board, I would continue to encourage you to get people to start learning a second language when they're young, because I think learning a second language then makes it very much easier. I have both a second and a third language, which I learned when I was young. Unfortunately, neither of them is French. But having said that, I'm taking French lessons now, which is interesting.
My questions are mainly for Madame Lalonde, and mainly directed towards the post-secondary education side of things.
I am really interested in finding out what sort of fall-out rate you get for those who are attending university-level immersion courses. Is it more significant for those who have studied immersion than for those who are naturally French-speaking people, or not?
I also apologize, because while I can handle three or four other languages, unfortunately, French is not one of them. It's something that I'm endeavouring very hard to study right now, although I must admit that when you have a second, third, or fourth language, it does become easier—but not past the age of 60.
I want to come back to the Peel District School Board. You mentioned that one of the reasons students want to study in French immersion is that there are better job prospects. Particularly in Canada, the job prospects are in government, and the military, and perhaps in well-known organizations like Air Canada or some mining companies, and so on.
Based on my experience in speaking three or four languages, you need to have that environment where you can talk about commerce and where you can conduct day-to-day living, arts and culture. What kinds of facilities or environment does a student in, say, the Peel region have for making French a lively language as they go into the French immersion program? Perhaps you can give an example of what they can do or what your program does for them to give them a sense that learning French is lively and not like learning a language like Latin.