Amendments and Subamendments to Motions / Relevance

Beyond scope of motion

Journals pp. 713-4

Debates p. 6967

Background

During debate on the motion of Mr. Pearson (Prime Minister) that "this House does not regard its vote of February 19 in connection with third reading of Bill C-193, [an Act to amend the Income Tax Act], which had been carried in all previous stages, as a vote of non-confidence in the Government", Mr. Gregoire (Lapointe) proposed an amendment. It said that the House would renew its confidence in the Government "provided that it take immediate steps to restore the economy of the country and to alleviate the serious unemployment problem", according to 10 specific measures included as part of the amendment. The Speaker indicated that he doubted the amendment was acceptable. After hearing brief comments from Mr. Gregoire and another Member, the Speaker made his decision.

Issue

Is an amendment acceptable that proposes to change substantially the terms of the original motion?

Decision

No. The amendment is out of order.

Reasons given by the Speaker

"This amendment goes far beyond the very limited scope of the motion now under consideration. It is a substantive motion or proposal which could be discussed only after notice or unanimous consent of the House."

References

Debates, February 23, 1968, pp. 6962-7.