Rules of Debate / Unparliamentary Language

Use of term "McCarthyism"

Debates p. 5534

Background

On November 28, Mr. Waddell (Vancouver—Kingsway) rose on a question of privilege following allegations made by Mr. Andre (Calgary Centre) to the effect that Mr. Waddell had made remarks which bordered on "McCarthyism". Given the connotation of this word which suggests "the idea of antidemocratic activity", Mr. Waddell said he hoped the Chair would study the question and ask Mr. Andre to withdraw his remarks. After listening to Members' comments, the Speaker took the matter under consideration and ruled a few days later.

Issue

Must the use of the term "McCarthyism" be considered unparliamentary?

Decision

No. It is not an unparliamentary remark.

Reasons given by the Speaker

While the term "McCarthyism" is opprobrious, it has become part of the political vocabulary and therefore its use is subject to interpretation and debate. The Chair need not pronounce on its use. To be unparliamentary, the language must be both abusive or insulting and give rise to a certain disorder, while the characteristics of parliamentary language are good temper and moderation.

Sources cited

May, 19th ed., pp. 429,445.

References

Debates, November 27, 1980, p. 5121; November 28, 1980, pp. 5153-5; December 1, 1980, pp. 5195-202.