Skip to main content

441-00737 (Justice)

Petition to the House of Commons

We, the undersigned citizens of Canada, draw the attention of the House of Commons to the following:

Whereas: coercion, intimidation, or other forms of pressure intended to force physicians and healthcare workers and health institutions to become parties in assisted suicide or euthanasia either directly or through effective referral is a violation of fundamental freedoms of conscience;

Whereas, conscience protections for medical professionals are necessary for patients to access their right to a second opinion;

Whereas, during testimony at the Special Joint Committee for Physician Assisted Dying, witnesses stated that the protection of conscience should be included in the government's legislative response to Carter v. Canada (AG);

Whereas, the Canadian Medical Association (CMA) confirmed that conscience protections for physicians and healthcare workers would not affect access to assisted suicide or euthanasia because over 24,000 physicians would be willing to do it;

Whereas, s.2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms protects freedom of conscience;

Therefore, we the undersigned, call upon the Parliament of Canada to enshrine in the Criminal Code the protection of conscience for physicians and healthcare workers from coercion or intimidation to provide or refer for assisted suicide or euthanasia.

Response by the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada

Signed by (Minister or Parliamentary Secretary): The Parliamentary Secretary Gary Anandasangaree

Medical assistance in dying (MAID) is a complex issue and many Canadians have deeply held views on the subject. On March 17, 2021, former Bill C-7, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (medical assistance in dying) (S.C. 2021, c.2), received Royal Assent. This responded to the September 2019 Superior Court of Quebec ruling in Truchon,which struck down the eligibility criterion of “reasonably foreseeable natural death” from the Criminal Code MAID regime. 

Conscience rights of health care providers and institutions are not matters that fall under the federal criminal law power. Nevertheless, the Government is committed to respecting the personal convictions of health care providers. Nothing in the CriminalCode compels a health care provider to provide or assist in the provision of MAID. This is already expressly stated under subsection 241.2(9) of the Criminal Code.

The petition calls on Parliament to ensure that medical practitioners and health care institutions are free from coercion or intimidation in relation to medical assistance in dying. Whether medical practitioners can refuse to provide or refer for MAID, and that healthcare institutions can refuse to permit it on their premises, are also matters of provincial responsibility. No province or territory currently compels practitioners to provide MAID. However, provinces and territories could adopt policies requiring “effective referrals” which, in the MAID context, means referring the person, in good faith, to a practitioner who does not object to MAID.

A provincial or territorial law or regulation that affects the conscience rights of providers can be challenged under the Charter, as was the effective referral policy of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario in 2018-2019, which applies to MAID. The Ontario Court of Appeal agreed that Ontario’s effective referral policy infringes on practitioners’ Charter-protected freedom of religion, but upheld the policy as a reasonable limit of religious freedom.

Presented to the House of Commons
Len Webber (Calgary Confederation)
October 5, 2022 (Petition No. 441-00737)
Government response tabled
November 18, 2022
Photo - Len Webber
Calgary Confederation
Conservative Caucus
Alberta

251 signatures

Only validated signatures are counted towards the total number of signatures.