House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
|
|
|
Notice PaperNo. 34 Tuesday, April 27, 2010 10:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
|
Introduction of Government Bills |
|
| April 26, 2010 — The Minister of State (Democratic Reform) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act (accountability with respect to political loans)”. |
Introduction of Private Members' Bills |
|
Notices of Motions (Routine Proceedings) |
|
Questions |
|
| Q-2212 — April 26, 2010 — Mr. Easter (Malpeque) — With respect to government decentralization: (a) since 2006, how many assessments have been completed of government departments or parts thereof, agencies, or Crown corporations which could be relocated from the National Capital Region to other regions of Canada; (b) since 2006, how many proposals have been prepared concerning the relocation of government departments or parts thereof, agencies, or Crown corporations from the National Capital Region to other regions of Canada; and (c) for each decentralization assessment and proposal, which government department, agency or Crown corporation was considered, and when was the assessment or proposal completed? |
| Q-2222 — April 26, 2010 — Mr. Easter (Malpeque) — With respect to the North American Free Trade Agreement Technical Working Group on Pesticides that was established in 1997: (a) in how many cases have Canadian pesticide standards been lowered in order to harmonize regulations with the United States; (b) in how many cases have Canadian pesticide standards been raised in order to harmonize regulations with the United States; (c) how many products have been affected by the lowering of Canadian pesticide standards in order to harmonize regulations with the United States; (d) how many products have been affected by the raising of Canadian standards in order to harmonize regulations with the United States; (e) what criteria do Canadian officials use to determine whether or not to lower pesticide standards; (f) what percentage of Canadian pesticide residue levels standards are stricter than American standards; and (g) what percentage of products in Canada are found to exceed legal residue limits? |
Notices of Motions for the Production of Papers |
|
Business of Supply |
|
| Opposition Motions |
| April 26, 2010 — Mr. Godin (Acadie—Bathurst) — That the House recognize that Gulf War Syndrome is an illness that affects Gulf War veterans who were exposed to a variety of toxic substances during the deployment. |
|
|
| April 26, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should not give businesses the tax breaks as currently planned. |
|
|
| April 26, 2010 — Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona) — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should, as has been the custom since the 1992 summit of the G7, convene a meeting of the G8 environment ministers prior to the G8/G20 meetings in June. |
|
|
| April 26, 2010 — Mr. Gravelle (Nickel Belt) — That, given the government's failure to act in the best interest of Canada when it allowed the sell-off of Inco, Falconbridge, Stelco and Nortel, the government should act immediately to protect the interests of Canadian workers, their communities and the strategic and long-term interests of the Canadian economy, by improving its review of foreign takeovers that involve key Canadian resource, manufacturing, high tech and, potentially, telecommunications companies, by strengthening the Investment Canada Act by: (a) lowering the threshold for public review; (b) ensuring public hearings in affected communities; and (c) requiring publication of the reasons for decisions and conditions to be met by approved foreign owners. |
|
|
| April 26, 2010 — Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley) — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should "Stand up for Canada" by prohibiting the export of raw bitumen. |
Government Business |
|
Private Members' Notices of Motions |
|
Private Members' Business |
| M-423 — March 24, 2010 — Resuming consideration of the motion of Mr. Paillé (Louis-Hébert), seconded by Mr. Pomerleau (Drummond), — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should purchase the Pont de Québec for one dollar and commit to quickly finishing the repair work so as to respect its importance as a historical monument and vital transportation link for the Quebec City region. |
| Debate — 1 hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
| Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
|
|
|
| 2 Response requested within 45 days |
|