House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
| 41st PARLIAMENT, 2nd SESSION | |
|
|
|
JournalsNo. 154 Wednesday, December 3, 2014 2:00 p.m. |
|
|
|
|
| Prayers |
| National Anthem |
| Statements By Members |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 31, Members made statements. |
| Oral Questions |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 30(5), the House proceeded to Oral Questions. |
| Motions |
|
By unanimous consent, it was resolved, — That the House recognize that Jean Béliveau was a legendary captain of the Montreal Canadiens; that it recognize that the Canadian people are deeply touched by the death of this man, a gentleman who was known not only for his athletic ability but also for his integrity; that it celebrate his successful hockey career, including 18 seasons with the Montreal Canadiens and ten Stanley Cup wins; and that it offer its condolences to his wife Élise, his daughter Hélène, his two grand-daughters Mylène and Magalie, and to the extended Montreal Canadiens family of which he was a part for six decades. |
| Daily Routine Of Business |
Tabling of Documents |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid upon the Table, — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions: |
— No. 412-4321 concerning telecommunications. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-412-3-12;
|
— No. 412-4341 concerning lighthouses. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-412-79-03;
|
— No. 412-4435 concerning asbestos. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-412-44-10;
|
— No. 412-4443 concerning the electoral system. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-412-12-19.
|
Presenting Reports from Interparliamentary Delegations |
Pursuant to Standing Order 34(1), Mr. Toone (Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine) presented the report of the Canadian Branch of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA) concerning its participation at the 63rd Westminster Seminar on Practice and Procedure, held in London, United Kingdom, from June 16 to 20, 2014. — Sessional Paper No. 8565-412-53-11.
|
|
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 34(1), Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke) presented the report of the Canadian NATO Parliamentary Association respecting its participation at the Meeting of the Standing Committee, held in Riga, Latvia, from April 4 to 6, 2014. — Sessional Paper No. 8565-412-50-13.
|
|
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 34(1), Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke) presented the report of the Canadian NATO Parliamentary Association respecting its participation in the joint visit of the Sub-Committee on Transatlantic Relations and the Sub-Committee on Transatlantic Economic Relations held in Vancouver and Victoria, British Columbia, from April 30 to May 3, 2014. — Sessional Paper No. 8565-412-50-14.
|
|
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 34(1), Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke) presented the report of the Canadian NATO Parliamentary Association respecting its participation at the 2014 Spring Session, held in Vilnius, Lithuania from May 30 to June 1, 2014. — Sessional Paper No. 8565-412-50-15.
|
Presenting Reports from Committees |
|
Mr. Wallace (Burlington), from the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, presented the Tenth Report of the Committee (Bill C-32, An Act to enact the Canadian Victims Bill of Rights and to amend certain Acts, with amendments). — Sessional Paper No. 8510-412-163. |
|
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 46 to 52, 54 and 56) was tabled. |
|
|
|
Mr. Wallace (Burlington), from the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, presented the 11th Report of the Committee (Bill S-221, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (assaults against public transit operators), without amendment). — Sessional Paper No. 8510-412-164. |
|
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meeting No. 56) was tabled. |
Introduction of Private Members' Bills |
|
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Ms. Young (Vancouver South), seconded by Mr. Wilks (Kootenay—Columbia), Bill C-639, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (protection of critical infrastructures), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House. |
Motions |
|
By unanimous consent, it was resolved, — That the 27th Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented on Monday, December 1, 2014, be concurred in. |
Presenting Petitions |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 36, petitions certified correct by the Clerk of Petitions were presented as follows: |
— by Mr. Cannan (Kelowna—Lake Country), one concerning sex selection (No. 412-4620);
|
— by Mr. Simms (Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor), one concerning the Canada Post Corporation (No. 412-4621);
|
— by Mr. Chong (Wellington—Halton Hills), one concerning climate change (No. 412-4622);
|
— by Mr. Breitkreuz (Yorkton—Melville), two concerning the Criminal Code of Canada (Nos. 412-4623 and 412-4624);
|
— by Mr. Galipeau (Ottawa—Orléans), one concerning sex selection (No. 412-4625);
|
— by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), one concerning the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (No. 412-4626);
|
— by Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), one concerning Old Age Security benefits (No. 412-4627);
|
— by Mrs. Ambler (Mississauga South), one concerning the Criminal Code of Canada (No. 412-4628);
|
— by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), one concerning hazardous products (No. 412-4629) and one concerning the World Trade Centre (No. 412-4630);
|
— by Ms. Young (Vancouver South), two concerning the Criminal Code of Canada (Nos. 412-4631 and 412-4632).
|
Questions on the Order Paper |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the returns to the following questions made into Orders for Return: |
Q-749 — Ms. Ashton (Churchill) — With respect to the Action Plan to Address Family Violence and Violent Crimes Against Aboriginal Women and Girls mentioned by the Minister of Status of Women and found on the Status of Women Canada’s Website: (a) what is the definition of the word “community” as used; (b) what is the definition of the word “aboriginal” as used; (c) how much of the funding mentioned in the Action Plan was announced for the first time in the Action Plan; (d) what criteria were used to justify the funding granted through the Action Plan; (e) what consultation was conducted in order to create the Action Plan, (i) who was the consultation conducted with, (ii) what are the details of any records or documents pertaining to these consultations; (f) how much of the overall funding discussed in the Action Plan is reserved exclusively for (i) First Nations peoples, (ii) Inuit peoples, (iii) Metis peoples; (g) how will the funding and programs mentioned in the Action Plan specifically include or exclude First Nations, Inuit and Metis regardless of residence; (h) how will Inuit, Metis and First Nations fairly benefit from funds and programs promised in the Action Plan; (i) what criteria will be used to ensure fair distribution; (j) what are the expected outcomes and outputs of the Community Safety Plans, (i) how do organizations, individuals, First Nations or communities apply for funding, (ii) how are funding recipients expected to account for that funding, (iii) what studies have been done to assess what resources will be needed in order to apply for and account for that funding, (iv) how was the need for this amount of funding determined; (k) what are the expected outcomes and outputs of the funding allocated to Justice Canada in order to “break intergenerational cycles of violence and abuse”, (i) how do organizations, individuals, First Nations or communities apply for this funding, (ii) how are funding recipients expected to account for that funding, (iii) what studies have been done to assess what resources will be needed in order to apply for and account for that funding, (iv) when will this funding be made available, (v) how was the need for this amount of funding determined; (l) what are the expected outcomes and outputs of the funding secured for Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada (AANDC)’s Family Violence Prevention Program, (i) how do organizations, individuals, First Nations or communities apply for this funding, (ii) how are funding recipients expected to account for that funding, (iii) what studies have been done to assess what resources will be needed in order to apply for and account for that funding, (iv) when will this funding be made available, (v) how was the need for this amount of funding determined; (m) what are the expected outcomes and outputs of the new 5 million dollars over 5 years secured for Status of Women Canada, (i) how do organizations, individuals, First Nations or communities apply for this funding, (ii) how are funding recipients expected to account for that funding, (iii) what studies have been done to assess what resources will be needed in order to apply for and account for that funding, (iv) when will this funding be made available, (v) is this funding to be distributed through the existing Women’s Program, (vi) will this funding be renewable after two years, (vii) will this funding include projects pertaining to research or advocacy, (viii) how will this funding be distributed fairly among First Nations, Metis and Inuit peoples, (ix) how was the need for this amount of funding determined; (n) of the 241 million dollars invested in the On-Reserve Income Assistance program, what percentage of this funding was allocated to women, (i) what gender-based analysis has been conducted for this program, (ii) how much of this funding was made available to Inuit, (iii) how much of this funding was made available to Metis peoples, (iv) how much of this funding was made available to First Nations; (o) what are the expected outcomes and outputs of the 1 million dollars secured for Status of Women Canada’s Women’s Program, (i) how do organizations, individuals, First Nations or communities apply for this funding, (ii) how are funding recipients expected to account for that funding, (iii) what studies have been done to assess what resources will be needed in order to apply for and account for that funding, (iv) when will this funding be made available, (v) how was the need for this amount of funding determined; (p) what are the expected outcomes and outputs of the 1.5 million dollars secured for Justice Canada to support Aboriginal Victims Family Violence Prevention Program, (i) how do organizations, individuals, First Nations or communities apply for this funding, (ii) how are funding recipients expected to account for that funding, (iii) what studies have been done to assess what resources will be needed in order to apply for and account for that funding, (iv) when will this funding be made available, (v) how was the need for this amount of funding determined; (q) how much money did the government spend on the Family Violence Prevention Program of AANDC between 2010 and 2015; (r) what are the expected outcomes and outputs of the 158.7 million dollars secured for the Family Violence Prevention Program of AANDC, (i) how do organizations, individuals, First Nations or communities apply for this funding, (ii) how are funding recipients expected to account for that funding, (iii) what studies have been done to assess what resources will be needed in order to apply for and account for that funding, (iv) when will this funding be made available, (v) how was the need for this funding determined; (s) what are the expected outcomes and outputs of the 18.5 million dollars that will directly support shelters, (i) how do shelters receive this funding, (ii) how are shelters expected to account for that funding, (iii) will this funding be made available to build new shelters, (iv) what percentage of this funding will be accessible to Inuit, (v) what percentage of this funding will be accessible to Metis, (vi) how much of this funding will be allocated to each reservation, (vii) how was the need for this amount of funding determined; and (t) how much funding did on-reserve shelters receive yearly from 2010 to 2015? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-749.
|
|
|
Q-751 — Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — With regard to the government’s commitment on July 3, 2013, to accept 1,300 Syrian refugees: (a) how many Syrians have been granted refugee status in Canada since July 3, 2013; (b) how many Syrian refugees have been admitted to Canada from overseas since July 3, 2013, broken down by (i) total amount, (ii) month; (c) how many of the Syrian refugees admitted to Canada from overseas since July 3, 2013 have been government-sponsored, broken down by (i) total amount, (ii) month; (d) how many of the Syrian refugees admitted to Canada from overseas since July 3, 2013 have been privately-sponsored, broken down by (i) total amount, (ii) month; (e) of the government-sponsored Syrian refugees admitted to Canada from overseas since July 3, 2013, how many were admitted from (i) Syria, (ii) Iraq, (iii) Jordan, (iv) Lebanon, (v) Turkey, (vi) elsewhere; (f) of the privately-sponsored Syrian refugees admitted to Canada from overseas since July 3, 2013, how many were admitted from (i) Syria, (ii) Iraq, (iii) Jordan, (iv) Lebanon, (v) Turkey, (vi) elsewhere; (g) of the privately-sponsored Syrian refugees admitted to Canada from overseas since July 3, 2013, how many were sponsored by (i) sponsorship agreement holders, (ii) groups of five, (iii) community sponsors; (h) how many applications to privately sponsor Syrian refugees have been received by Citizenship and Immigration Canada, broken down by (i) total amount, (ii) sponsorship agreement holders, (iii) groups of five, (iv) community sponsors; (i) how many applications were received on behalf of Syrians seeking refugee status in Canada, from (i) January 1, 2011 to July 3, 2013, (ii) July 3, 2013 to present; (j) of the Syrians granted refugee status in Canada since July 3, 2013, how many applied from within Canada; (k) of the applications received on behalf of Syrians seeking refugee status in Canada, how many remain in progress, dating from (i) January 1, 2011 to July 3, 2013, (ii) July 3, 2013 to present; (l) what is the average processing time for applications received from January 1, 2011 until July 3, 2013, on behalf of Syrians seeking refugee status in Canada, broken down by (i) overall time, (ii) privately-sponsored refugee applicants, (iii) government-sponsored refugee applicants; (m) what is the average processing time for all applications received from January 1, 2011 until July 3, 2013, on behalf of individuals seeking refugee status in Canada, broken down by (i) overall time, (ii) privately-sponsored refugee applicants, (iii) government-sponsored refugee applicants; (n) what is the average processing time for applications received since July 3, 2013, on behalf of Syrians seeking refugee status in Canada, broken down by (i) overall time, (ii) privately-sponsored refugee applicants, (iii) government-sponsored refugee applicants; and (o) what is the average processing time for all applications received since July 3, 2013, on behalf of individuals seeking refugee status in Canada, broken down by (i) overall time, (ii) privately-sponsored refugee applicants, (iii) government-sponsored refugee applicants? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-751.
|
| Business of Supply |
|
The Order was read for the consideration of the Business of Supply. |
|
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved, — That, in the opinion of the House: (a) the next federal election should be the last conducted under the current first-past-the-post electoral system which has repeatedly delivered a majority of seats to parties supported by a minority of voters, or under any other winner-take-all electoral system; and (b) a form of mixed-member proportional representation would be the best electoral system for Canada. |
|
Debate arose thereon. |
| Notices of Motions |
|
Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) gave notice of the intention to move a motion at the next sitting of the House, pursuant to Standing Order 78(3), for the purpose of allotting a specified number of days or hours for the consideration and disposal of the third reading of Bill C-40, An Act respecting the Rouge National Urban Park. |
|
|
|
Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) gave notice of the intention to move a motion at the next sitting of the House, pursuant to Standing Order 78(3), for the purpose of allotting a specified number of days or hours for the consideration and disposal of the report stage and third reading stage of Bill C-43, A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on February 11, 2014 and other measures. |
| Business of Supply |
|
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), in relation to the Business of Supply. |
|
The debate continued. |
|
At 5:15 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 81(17), the Speaker interrupted the proceedings. |
|
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
| (Division No. 291 -- Vote no 291) | |
| YEAS: 110, NAYS: 166 |
|
|
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Day Lapointe Papillon Total: -- 110 |
|
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Ablonczy Daniel Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) Saxton Total: -- 166 |
|
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
|
Mr. Clement (President of the Treasury Board), seconded by Mr. Oliver (Minister of Finance), moved Motion No. 1, — That Vote 1b, in the amount of $8,400,358, under VETERANS AFFAIRS — Veterans Affairs — Operating expenditures, in the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2015, be concurred in. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 1 and it was agreed to. |
|
Mr. Clement (President of the Treasury Board), seconded by Mr. Oliver (Minister of Finance), moved, — That the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2015, except any Vote disposed of earlier today, be concurred in. |
|
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
| (Division No. 292 -- Vote no 292) | |
| YEAS: 151, NAYS: 127 |
|
|
YEAS -- POUR Ablonczy Clement Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) Saxton Total: -- 151 |
|
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Allen (Welland) Dewar Kellway Pacetti Total: -- 127 |
|
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
|
Pursuant to Standing Orders 81(21) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Clement (President of the Treasury Board), seconded by Mr. Oliver (Minister of Finance), Bill C-45, An Act for granting to Her Majesty certain sums of money for the federal public administration for the financial year ending March 31, 2015, was read the first time and ordered to be printed. |
|
Mr. Clement (President of the Treasury Board), seconded by Mr. Oliver (Minister of Finance), moved, — That the Bill be now read a second time and referred to a Committee of the Whole. |
|
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
| (Division No. 293 -- Vote no 293) | |
| YEAS: 151, NAYS: 127 (See list under Division No. 292) |
|
|
Accordingly, Bill C-45, An Act for granting to Her Majesty certain sums of money for the federal public administration for the financial year ending March 31, 2015, was read the second time and referred to a Committee of the Whole. |
|
|
The Committee considered the Bill and reported it without amendment. |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(12), Mr. Clement (President of the Treasury Board), seconded by Mr. Oliver (Minister of Finance), moved, — That the Bill be concurred in at report stage. |
|
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
| (Division No. 294 -- Vote no 294) | |
| YEAS: 151, NAYS: 127 (See list under Division No. 292) |
|
|
Accordingly, the Bill was concurred in at report stage. |
|
|
Mr. Clement (President of the Treasury Board), seconded by Mr. Oliver (Minister of Finance), moved, — That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass. |
|
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
| (Division No. 295 -- Vote no 295) | |
| YEAS: 151, NAYS: 127 (See list under Division No. 292) |
|
|
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed. |
|
| Deferred Recorded Divisions |
Private Members' Business |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Patry (Jonquière—Alma), seconded by Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska), — That Bill C-574, An Act to amend the Department of Public Works and Government Services Act (use of wood), be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates. |
|
|
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
| (Division No. 296 -- Vote no 296) | |
| YEAS: 121, NAYS: 154 |
|
|
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Dewar Julian Pacetti Total: -- 121 |
|
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Ablonczy Clarke Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) Ritz Total: -- 154 |
|
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 98(4), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Van Kesteren (Chatham-Kent—Essex), seconded by Mr. Sweet (Ancaster—Dundas—Flamborough—Westdale), — That Bill C-591, An Act to amend the Canada Pension Plan and the Old Age Security Act (pension and benefits), be now read a third time and do pass. |
|
|
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
| (Division No. 297 -- Vote no 297) | |
| YEAS: 276, NAYS: 0 |
|
|
YEAS -- POUR Ablonczy Daniel Kerr Plamondon Total: -- 276 |
|
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Nil--Aucun |
|
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
|
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed. |
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 98(4), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Valeriote (Guelph), seconded by Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), — That Bill C-247, An Act to provide that the Department of Employment and Social Development is the main point of contact with the Government of Canada in respect of the death of a Canadian citizen or resident, be now read a third time and do pass. |
|
|
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
| (Division No. 298 -- Vote no 298) | |
| YEAS: 276, NAYS: 0 |
|
|
YEAS -- POUR Ablonczy Cuzner Kerr Plamondon Total: -- 276 |
|
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Nil--Aucun |
|
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
|
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed. |
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 98(4), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Sweet (Ancaster—Dundas—Flamborough—Westdale), seconded by Mr. Allison (Niagara West—Glanbrook), — That Bill S-213, An Act respecting Lincoln Alexander Day, be now read a third time and do pass. |
|
|
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
| (Division No. 299 -- Vote no 299) | |
| YEAS: 275, NAYS: 0 |
|
|
YEAS -- POUR Ablonczy Daniel Komarnicki Poilievre Total: -- 275 |
|
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Nil--Aucun |
|
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
|
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed. |
|
| Private Members' Business |
|
At 6:47 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 30(7), the House proceeded to the consideration of Private Members' Business. |
|
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mrs. Ambler (Mississauga South), seconded by Mr. Leef (Yukon), — That the House call on the government to take action to prevent forced marriages and any kind of non-consensual sponsorship in the immigration system by amending the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations so as to: (a) ban the use of proxy, telephone, and fax marriages as a means to spousal sponsorship; (b) disallow explicitly, in section 5, the use of proxy, telephone and fax marriages for the purpose of immigration; and (c) set out administrative measures that communicate clearly to visa officers how to detect a proxy, telephone or fax marriage. (Private Members' Business M-505) |
|
The debate continued. |
|
The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to Order made Tuesday, November 25, 2014, the recorded division was deferred until Wednesday, December 10, 2014, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions. |
| Messages from the Senate |
|
A message was received from the Senate as follows: |
— ORDERED: That a message be sent to the House of Commons to acquaint that House that the Senate has passed Bill C-3, An Act to enact the Aviation Industry Indemnity Act, to amend the Aeronautics Act, the Canada Marine Act, the Marine Liability Act and the Canada Shipping Act, 2001 and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, without amendment.
|
| Returns and Reports Deposited with the Clerk of the House |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(1), papers deposited with the Clerk of the House were laid upon the Table as follows: |
— by Mr. Fast (Minister of International Trade) — Summaries of the Corporate Plan and Borrowing Plan for 2014-2015 to 2018-2019 and of the Operating and Capital Budgets for 2014-2015 of the Canadian Commercial Corporation, pursuant to the Financial Administration Act, R.S. 1985, c. F-11, sbs. 125(4). — Sessional Paper No. 8562-412-817-01. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on International Trade)
|
— by Mrs. Glover (Minister of Canadian Heritage and Official Languages) — Summaries of the Corporate Plan and Operating and Capital Budgets for 2014-2015 to 2018-2019 of the Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21, pursuant to the Financial Administration Act, R.S. 1985, c. F-11, sbs. 125(4). — Sessional Paper No. 8562-412-869-02. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage)
|
— by Mrs. Glover (Minister of Canadian Heritage and Official Languages) — Summaries of the Corporate Plan for 2014-2015 to 2018-2019 and of the Operating and Capital Budgets for 2014-2015 of the National Gallery of Canada, pursuant to the Financial Administration Act, R.S. 1985, c. F-11, sbs. 125(4). — Sessional Paper No. 8562-412-859-02. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage)
|
| Adjournment Proceedings |
|
At 7:40 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 38(1), the question “That this House do now adjourn” was deemed to have been proposed. |
|
After debate, the question was deemed to have been adopted. |
|
Accordingly, at 8:00 p.m., the Speaker adjourned the House until tomorrow at 10:00 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1). |